Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Animal study demonstrates that a V1-deleted HIV envelope vaccine provides 81% protection against mucosal SHIV in rhesus macaques, indicating that anti-inflammatory mucosal responses impede viral...
We evaluate the efficacy and immunogenicity of HIV clade A/E A244 envelope (Env) immunogens with the 23 amino acids of variable region 1 deleted (ΔV1) or retained (wild-type [WT]) in macaques. Only the ΔV1 regimen significantly reduces the risk of mucosal acquisition of clade C simian/human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) 1157(QNE)Y173H versus controls, providing 81% efficacy and leaving 10 of 12 immunized animals uninfected. ΔV1 vaccination induces higher systemic antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) targeting helical-V2 and anti-inflammatory myeloid cells, which, together with IL-17 + NKp44 + innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and systemic PD-1 + helper T cells, correlated with reduced infection risk. By contrast, WT immunization induces higher IL-15, CCR2 + pDC, and gp70/V1V2-biased responses, which, along with mucosal IFN-γ + NKG2A − NKp44 − ILCs, were associated with increased susceptibility. Ex vivo , ΔV1 gp120 reduced CCR5 expression on CD4 + T cells relative to WT gp120, consistent with the anti-inflammatory mucosal response by ΔV1-vaccine regimens in vivo . Thus, V1 deletion promotes an anti-inflammatory mucosal landscape less permissive to HIV seeding and dissemination following virus exposure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: