Key result
Implantation of the TRI Technologies valve prosthesis in 34 patients resulted in 2 cases of catastrophic leaflet escape, prompting the interruption of the implantation program.
Observational (n=34)
No
The TRI Technologies mechanical valve prosthesis carries a high risk of catastrophic structural failure due to leaflet escape, prompting cessation of its use.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alerts clinicians to avoid this prosthesis; leaves open durability standards for mechanical valves.
BACKGROUND: Leaflet escape is a mode of structural valve failure for mechanical prostheses. This complication previously has been reported for both monoleaflet and bileaflet valve models. We report 2 leaflet escape occurrences observed in 2 patients who underwent valve replacement with a TRI Technologies valve prosthesis. METHODS AND RESULTS: At the University of Padua, between November 2000 and February 2002, 36 TRI Technologies valve prostheses (26 aortic and 10 mitral) were implanted in 34 patients (12 women and 22 men) with a mean age of 59.9+/-10.3 years (range, 30 to 75 years). There were 5 deaths: 3 in hospital, 1 early after discharge, and 1 late. Two patients experienced a catastrophic prosthetic leaflet escape; the first patient was a 52-year-old man who died 10 days after aortic valve and ascending aorta replacement, and the second was a 58-year-old man who underwent a successful emergency reoperation 20 months after mitral valve replacement. Examination of the explanted prostheses showed in both cases a leaflet escape caused by a leaflet's pivoting system fracture. Prophylactic replacement was then successfully accomplished so far in 12 patients, without evidence of structural valve failure in any of them. Among other significant postoperative complications, we observed 3 major thromboembolisms, 1 hemorrhage, and 1 paravalvular leak. CONCLUSIONS: These catastrophes prompted us to interrupt the implantation program, and they cast a shadow on the durability of the TRI Technologies valve prosthesis because of its high risk of structural failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bottio et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Valve replacement (n=34). TRI Technologies valve prosthesis was evaluated on Leaflet escape. Implantation of the TRI Technologies valve prosthesis in 34 patients resulted in 2 cases of catastrophic leaflet escape, prompting the interruption of the implantation program.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: