Key result
Intravenous antazoline achieved higher rapid cardioversion rates to sinus rhythm compared to placebo, amiodarone, or propafenone in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation.
Why the study?
Intravenous antiarrhythmic agents currently used for recent-onset atrial fibrillation have low efficacy and safety profiles, prompting evaluation of intravenous antazoline.
Does intravenous antazoline improve rapid cardioversion to sinus rhythm in patients with recent-onset short-duration atrial fibrillation?
Systematic Review (n=1,465)
Does intravenous antazoline improve rapid cardioversion to sinus rhythm in patients with recent-onset short-duration atrial fibrillation?
Relative Risk: 6.86 (95% CI 2.66–17.72)
Absolute Event Rate: 72.2% vs 10.5%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Intravenous antazoline appears to be an effective and safe pharmacological agent for the rapid cardioversion of short-duration atrial fibrillation, potentially offering higher efficacy than amiodarone or propafenone based on mostly observational data.
Antazoline may enable faster cardioversion than amiodarone or propafenone in recent-onset AF; leaves open need for confirmatory RCTs before practice change.
Context: In the emergency department, patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation are typically managed with intravenous antiarrhythmic agents. However, the currently used agents have a low efficacy and safety profile. Antazoline is an antihistaminic agent that has been shown to have a strong antiarrhythmic effect when administered intravenously, facilitating rapid conversion to normal sinus rhythm. Aims: To systematically review the literature on the safety and efficacy of antazoline in the treatment of recent-onset short-duration atrial fibrillation and to compare the clinical efficacy of antazoline to that of other antiarrhythmic agents listed in clinical guidelines. Methods: The study was written in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol. A comprehensive search of databases (PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Sciences, Google Scholar, Clinical trial.gov) for relevant studies in English from inception to 2021 using keywords involving “antazoline” AND other terms such as “antiarrhythmic”, “atrial fibrillation”, and “arrhythmia”. Results: Of the 478 studies identified, 446 were screened, and 7 were included, one of which was a randomized control trial, and the others were observational studies. The majority of studies indicated that antazoline resulted in rapid cardioversion to sinus rhythm. When compared to other pharmacological cardioversion options, antazoline achieved higher cardioversion rates than amiodarone or propafenone and was generally a safer option. Conclusions: Antazoline appears to be an effective pharmacological agent for the rapid cardioversion of short-term atrial fibrillation. More randomized clinical trials, however, should be conducted to strengthen the evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aldulaymi et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Recent-onset short-duration atrial fibrillation (n=1,465). Antazoline vs. Placebo, amiodarone, or propafenone was evaluated on Successful conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm (based on the included RCT) (RR 6.86, 95% CI 2.66-17.72, p=<0.0001). Intravenous antazoline achieved higher rapid cardioversion rates to sinus rhythm compared to placebo, amiodarone, or propafenone in patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: