Key result
Among participants with an Apple Watch irregular pulse notification but no atrial fibrillation on a subsequent ECG patch, non-AF arrhythmias were detected in 40.1%.
Why the study?
The Apple Watch irregular pulse algorithm has a positive predictive value of 0.84 for AF, but the prevalence of arrhythmias other than AF in those with an irregular pulse notification was unknown.
What is the prevalence of non-AF arrhythmias in individuals with a smartwatch-detected irregular pulse who do not have AF on a subsequent ECG patch?
Observational (n=297)
What is the prevalence of non-AF arrhythmias in individuals with a smartwatch-detected irregular pulse who do not have AF on a subsequent ECG patch?
In patients with a smartwatch-detected irregular pulse but no atrial fibrillation on a subsequent ECG patch, approximately 40% have other detectable arrhythmias, primarily premature atrial and ventricular contractions.
Smartwatch irregular pulse notifications may indicate non-AF arrhythmias like frequent ectopy; leaves open algorithm specificity and need for prospective validation.
Background: The Apple watch irregular pulse detection algorithm was found to have a positive predictive value of 0.84 for identification of atrial fibrillation (AF). We sought to describe the prevalence of arrhythmias other than AF in those with an irregular pulse detected on a smartwatch. Methods: The Apple Heart Study investigated a smartwatch-based irregular pulse notification algorithm to identify AF. For this secondary analysis, we analyzed participants who received an ambulatory ECG patch after index irregular pulse notification. We excluded participants with AF identified on ECG patch and described the prevalence of other arrhythmias on the remaining participant ECG patches. We also reported the proportion of participants self-reporting subsequent AF diagnosis. Results: Among 419 297 participants enrolled in the Apple Heart Study, 450 participant ECG patches were analyzed, with no AF on 297 ECG patches (66%). Non-AF arrhythmias (excluding supraventricular tachycardias <30 beats and pauses <3 seconds) were detected in 119 participants (40.1%) with ECG patches without AF. The most common arrhythmias were frequent PACs (burden ≥1% to <5%, 15.8%; ≥5% to <15%, 8.8%), atrial tachycardia (≥30 beats, 5.4%), frequent PVCs (burden ≥1% to <5%, 6.1%; ≥5% to <15%, 2.7%), and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (4–7 beats, 6.4%; ≥8 beats, 3.7%). Of 249 participants with no AF detected on ECG patch and patient-reported data available, 76 participants (30.5%) reported subsequent AF diagnosis. Conclusions: In participants with an irregular pulse notification on the Apple Watch and no AF observed on ECG patch, atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, mostly PACs and PVCs, were detected in 40% of participants. Defining optimal care for patients with detection of incidental arrhythmias other than AF is important as AF detection is further investigated, implemented, and refined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perino et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Irregular pulse detected on smartwatch without atrial fibrillation (n=297). Irregular pulse notification on a smartwatch was evaluated on Prevalence of non-AF arrhythmias (excluding supraventricular tachycardias <30 beats and pauses <3 seconds). Among participants with an Apple Watch irregular pulse notification but no atrial fibrillation on a subsequent ECG patch, non-AF arrhythmias were detected in 40.1%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: