Key result
A one standard-deviation increment in C2 arterial function was associated with a reduced risk of first coronary heart disease event (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.63-0.86) and improved risk discrimination.
Why the study?
Do arterial function parameters predict time to first coronary heart disease event in participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis?
Cohort (n=6,531)
Yes
Do arterial function parameters predict time to first coronary heart disease event in participants of the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis?
Among arterial function parameters, C2 (derived from diastolic pulse contour analysis) provides independent predictive value and additional discrimination for future coronary heart disease events.
C2 modestly improves CHD discrimination beyond standard factors; extends arterial function evidence but remains hypothesis-generating for risk models.
Arterial dysfunction has been linked to decline in cardiac function and increased risk of cardiovascular disease events. We calculated the value of arterial function, measured at baseline (2000–2002), in predicting time to first coronary heart disease (CHD) event (median follow-up, 10.2 years) among participants in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Measures included the following: C1 and C2, derived from diastolic pulse contour analysis from the radial artery blood pressure waveform obtained by tonometry (n = 6,336); carotid distensibility and Young's elastic modulus at the carotid artery, derived from carotid artery ultrasonography (n = 6,531 and 6,528); and aortic distensibility, measured using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (n = 3,677). After adjustment, the hazard ratio for a CHD event per standard-deviation increment in arterial function was 0.97 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86, 1.10) for C1, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.63, 0.86) for C2, 0.98 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.11) for carotid distensibility, 0.99 (95% CI: 0.90, 1.09) for Young's modulus, and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.10) for aortic distensibility. We examined the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the model with full adjustment plus the addition of each measure individually. C2 provided additional discrimination for the prediction of CHD (area under the curve = 0.736 vs. 0.743; P = 0.04). Lower C2 was associated with a higher risk of future CHD events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hom et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Coronary heart disease (n=6,531). Arterial function parameters (specifically C2) vs. Per standard-deviation increment was evaluated on Time to first coronary heart disease (CHD) event (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.63-0.86). A one standard-deviation increment in C2 arterial function was associated with a reduced risk of first coronary heart disease event (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.63-0.86) and improved risk discrimination.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: