Key result
A resting CVIB above 3 dB predicted segmental contractile reserve in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction with 81% sensitivity and 60% specificity (p < 0.0001).
Why the study?
Does the measurement of cyclic variation of integrated backscatter (CVIB) at rest predict contractile reserve in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction?
Observational (n=23)
Does the measurement of cyclic variation of integrated backscatter (CVIB) at rest predict contractile reserve in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction?
Assessment of the acoustic properties of the myocardium at rest using CVIB can predict segmental contractile reserve in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction.
May identify contractile reserve noninvasively in chronic LV dysfunction; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: To clarify whether assessment of the acoustic properties of the myocardium at rest can predict contractile reserve in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction. METHODS: 23 patients (mean (SD) age 63 (12) years) with chronic left ventricular dysfunction were studied. The magnitude of cardiac cycle dependent variation of integrated backscatter (CVIB) of the myocardium was measured at rest in the basal and mid segment of the septum and posterior wall of the left ventricle, using a real time two dimensional integrated backscatter imaging system. The results were compared with the percentage wall thickening and the wall motion at rest and during low dose dobutamine infusion. The wall motion was graded as normal, hypokinetic, or akinetic and contractile reserve was considered present when an akinetic or hypokinetic segment improved during dobutamine infusion. RESULTS: The CVIB at rest correlated with per cent wall thickening at rest and during dobutamine infusion (at rest, r = 0.61, p < 0.0001, during dobutamine, r = 0.76, p < 0.0001). Of the 76 segments examined, 27 showed contractile reserve. The mean CVIB at rest was significantly greater in segments with contractile reserve than in those without (p < 0.0001). CVIB above 3 dB at rest predicted segments with contractile reserve with a sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 60%, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: CVIB reflected not only myocardial contractility but also the functional capacity of the myocardium. It predicted segmental contractile reserve in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
T Muro (2001) conducted an observational in Chronic left ventricular dysfunction (n=23). Cardiac cycle dependent variation of integrated backscatter (CVIB) at rest was evaluated on Contractile reserve during low dose dobutamine infusion (p=<0.0001). A resting CVIB above 3 dB predicted segmental contractile reserve in patients with chronic left ventricular dysfunction with 81% sensitivity and 60% specificity (p < 0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Heart