Key result
Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy had significantly higher left ventricular vortex area (0.237 vs 0.196, P=0.029) and energy dissipation than healthy volunteers.
Why the study?
Does echocardiographic particle image velocimetry (E-PIV) detect differences in left ventricular fluid dynamics between patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and healthy volunteers?
Case-Control (n=40)
Does echocardiographic particle image velocimetry (E-PIV) detect differences in left ventricular fluid dynamics between patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and healthy volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.237% vs 0.196%
p-value: p=0.029
E-PIV can quantitatively evaluate aberrant left ventricular fluid dynamics in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, which correlate with left ventricular systolic function.
E-PIV detects altered LV vortex dynamics and higher energy dissipation in DCM correlating with EF; leaves open clinical adoption pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to analyze left ventricular (LV) fluid dynamics in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) by using echocardiographic particle image velocimetry (E-PIV). METHODS: Twenty patients with DCM and twenty healthy volunteers were examined. LV ultrasound contrast was administered by intravenous bolus injection. At least three dynamic contrast-enhanced echocardiographic images of cardiac cycles from apical three-chamber view and four-chamber view were obtained. The acquired echocardiographic image loops were processed off line by HyperFlow. RESULTS: In healthy hearts, the filling flow in the left ventricle finally comes to be a single large clockwise vortex, which smoothly redirects the blood to the outflow tract. Meanwhile, aberrant flow patterns are observed in the patients with DCM. In the DCM group, the vortex area (0.237 ± 0.063 vs 0.196 ± 0.129, P = .029), vortex depth (0.396 ± 0.134 vs 0.293 ± 0.143, P = .025), and vortex length (0.534 ± 0.089 vs 0.435 ± 0.176, P = .004) are significantly higher. The flow force angle (29.979 ± 8.208 vs 35.896 ± 6.044, P = .013) is significantly lower, and energy dissipation (0.975 ± 0.552 vs 0.578 ± 0.295, P = .006) is significantly higher. A negative linear relation is indicated between the following pairs of parameters: vortex depth and LV ejection fraction (EF) (r = -.350, P = .027); vortex length and LV EF (r = -.321, P = .044); energy dissipation and LV EF (r = -.523, P = .001). A positive linear relation is indicated between flow force angle and LV EF (r = .365, P = .021). CONCLUSION: E-PIV can effectively and quantitatively evaluate LV fluid dynamics in patients with DCM. LV fluid dynamics and LV systolic function interact with and affect each other.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Dilated cardiomyopathy (n=40). Dilated cardiomyopathy vs. Healthy volunteers was evaluated on Vortex area (p=0.029). Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy had significantly higher left ventricular vortex area (0.237 vs 0.196, P=0.029) and energy dissipation than healthy volunteers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: