Key result
Subcutaneous furosemide demonstrates efficacy comparable to intravenous furosemide in diuresis and weight loss for managing symptomatic congestion in heart failure patients.
Why the study?
ADHF patients with symptomatic congestion often require hospitalization for IV diuretics, increasing costs and burden, making subcutaneous furosemide a potential outpatient alternative needing efficacy and safety evaluation.
Does subcutaneous furosemide improve diuresis and symptoms compared to oral or intravenous furosemide in adult heart failure patients with symptomatic congestion?
Systematic Review (n=687)
Does subcutaneous furosemide improve diuresis and symptoms compared to oral or intravenous furosemide in adult heart failure patients with symptomatic congestion?
Subcutaneous furosemide offers a promising, effective, and safe alternative to intravenous diuretics for managing acute decompensated heart failure, potentially facilitating outpatient management and reducing hospital admissions.
BACKGROUND: Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients with symptomatic congestion often require in-hospital admission for intravenous (IV) diuretic, impacting both patient well-being and healthcare expenses. Subcutaneous (SC) furosemide has a potential to facilitate outpatient management of ADHF patients. Thus, this study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of SC furosemide utilization, offering a potential alternative to traditional IV administration. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted until April 14 2024 across scientific databases. This review included studies comparing SC furosemide with oral and IV formulations in adult HF patients. RESULTS: This study analyzed 687 patients from 20 studies. The results demonstrate that SC furosemide can effectively manage symptomatic congestion in HF patients and results in significant cost reductions, symptom relief, and improved quality of life. Although further investigation into mortality rates is needed, SC furosemide demonstrates efficacy comparable to IV furosemide in diuresis and weight loss, with similar bioavailability and natriuretic effects. Adverse events are generally minor, predominantly related to skin irritation. Innovative strategies, such as developing isotonic alkaline solutions and improved infusion devices, are being explored to address these challenges. CONCLUSION: SC furosemide offers a promising alternative for managing ADHF, particularly in symptomatic HF patients with volume overload. The integration of SC furosemide into routine clinical practice and future guidelines, could optimize the management of HF, reducing hospital admission and improving patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Widiarti et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in Heart Failure (n=687). Subcutaneous furosemide vs. Intravenous furosemide, oral furosemide, or placebo was evaluated on Efficacy (diuresis, weight loss, symptom relief) and safety. Subcutaneous furosemide demonstrates efficacy comparable to intravenous furosemide in diuresis and weight loss for managing symptomatic congestion in heart failure patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: