Why the study?
A viral genetic background was needed to evaluate vaccine protection and monitor the adaptive evolution of EV-A71 following vaccination.
Observational (n=561)
Monitoring genome-wide changes of EV-A71 is valuable for detecting adaptive mutations that may affect vaccine immunogenicity.
Genomic surveillance of EV-A71 warrants consideration; leaves open whether 2A substitutions alter vaccine performance in practice.
Enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) infection is known to cause hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Last year, an inactivated EV-A71 whole virus vaccine was used to prevent this disease in Yunnan, China. To obtain a viral genetic background for evaluating vaccine protection and monitor the adaptive evolution of the virus after the vaccination, a 5-year molecular epidemiology survey was performed before the vaccination. Twenty-six EV-A71 strains were separated from 561 stool specimens of patients with serious HFMD. The whole-genomic sequences of these strains were sequenced. Phylogenetic trees were constructed, and the mutation spectra were analyzed based on these viral sequences. There was no obvious mutation for the circular EV-A71 strains of the same year. Pathogenic EV-A71 strains may arise from a "subgroup" randomly each year. Whole-genomic analyses showed that a hotspot nonsynonymous substitution potentially affecting the immunogenicity of vaccines was found in the 2A gene, but not in genes of the viral capsid proteins, and the genetic diversity of whole viral genomes associated with the incidence of HFMD. Therefore, it will be valuable to monitor the genome-wide changes of EV-A71 to detect the adaptive mutations affecting immunogenicity or perform investigations using genetic diversity as a parameter.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) (n=561). EV-A71 genetic diversity and mutation spectra was evaluated on Viral genetic background and mutation spectra.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: