Key result
Two novel anti-sense RNA regulators (TBsRNA-33 and 37) in Trypanosoma brucei were identified that associate with ribosomes and interact with distinct mRNA species to regulate translation.
Why the study?
Trypanosoma brucei lacks conventional transcriptional regulation of protein-coding genes, and mechanisms controlling gene expression beyond RNA binding proteins remain incompletely understood.
Identifies novel anti-sense RNA regulators in Trypanosoma brucei, suggesting an additional layer of gene expression control in these parasites.
Hypothesis-generating for trypanosome gene control; extends known mechanisms of translation regulation in parasites.
The parasite Trypanosoma brucei is the causative agent of sleeping sickness and cycles between insect and mammalian hosts. The parasite appears to lack conventional transcriptional regulation of protein coding genes, and mRNAs are processed from polycistronic transcripts by the concerted action of trans- splicing and polyadenylation. Regulation of mRNA function is mediated mainly by RNA binding proteins affecting mRNA stability and translation. In this study, we describe the identification of 62 non-coding (nc) RNAs that are developmentally regulated and/or respond to stress. We characterized two novel anti-sense RNA regulators (TBsRNA-33 and 37) that originate from the rRNA loci, associate with ribosomes and polyribosomes, and interact in vivo with distinct mRNA species to regulate translation. Thus, this study suggests for the first-time anti-sense RNA regulators as an additional layer for controlling gene expression in these parasites.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rajan et al. (2020) studied Trypanosoma brucei infection. TBsRNA-33 and 37 was evaluated on Identification and characterization of non-coding RNAs regulating mRNA translation. Two novel anti-sense RNA regulators (TBsRNA-33 and 37) in Trypanosoma brucei were identified that associate with ribosomes and interact with distinct mRNA species to regulate translation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: