Key result
Intracardiac echocardiography signal intensity ≥ 137 SIU accurately differentiated ventricular tachycardia scar from nonscar zones (AUC 0.91, P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does intracardiac echocardiography accurately identify ventricular tachycardia scar substrate compared to electroanatomic mapping in patients undergoing VT ablation?
Observational (n=22)
Does intracardiac echocardiography accurately identify ventricular tachycardia scar substrate compared to electroanatomic mapping in patients undergoing VT ablation?
Absolute Event Rate: 149% vs 88%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Intracardiac echocardiography can identify ventricular tachycardia anatomical substrate by differentiating scarred myocardium based on signal intensity.
May enable real-time scar identification in VT ablation; leaves open impact on procedural success versus mapping alone.
BACKGROUND: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is increasingly used to guide complex ablation procedures. This study aimed to assess the scar substrate of ventricular tachycardia (VT) by ICE in patients undergoing VT ablation. METHODS: In 22 patients undergoing VT ablation (10 ischemic, 12 nonischemic), the Biosense CARTOSOUND module (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) was used for three-dimensional reconstruction of the ventricles. The characteristics and appearance with ICE imaging of voltage-defined scar zones (bipolar voltage <0.5 mV), border zones (0.5-1.5 mV), and normal myocardium (>1.5 mV) on electroanatomic maps were evaluated. The standard image analysis software Image J (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to analyze signal intensity (mean pixel signal intensity unit [SIU]) and heterogeneity (standard deviation of signal intensity in analyzed area) on ICE images. RESULTS: A total of 83 myocardial areas were analyzed from two-dimensional ICE images (15 scars, 31 border zones, and 37 normal). Voltage-defined scar zones had increased signal intensities compared to border zones (149 SIU vs 104 SIU, P < 0.0001) and normal myocardium (88 SIU, P < 0.0001). Border zones were more likely to have heterogeneous densities compared to normal myocardium (standard deviation of signal intensity 20 SIU vs 12 SIU, P < 0.0001). In receiver-operator characteristic analyses, signal intensity ≥ 137 SIU differentiated scar from nonscar zones (area under curve 0.91, P < 0.0001). Software-based color enhancement of areas with signal intensity ≥ 137 SIU allowed identification of the VT substrate in all 15 patients with voltage-defined scar zones. CONCLUSIONS: ICE provides important information about the VT anatomical substrate and may have potential to identify areas of scarred myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hussein et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachycardia (n=22). Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) vs. Electroanatomic mapping (voltage-defined zones) was evaluated on Signal intensity of voltage-defined scar zones compared to normal myocardium (p=<0.0001). Intracardiac echocardiography signal intensity ≥ 137 SIU accurately differentiated ventricular tachycardia scar from nonscar zones (AUC 0.91, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: