Key result
Ivabradine numerically but not significantly reduced cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction by 8% in the subgroup of heart failure patients with angina.
Why the study?
Does ivabradine reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and concomitant angina pectoris?
RCT (n=6,505)
randomized
Does ivabradine reduce cardiovascular outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and concomitant angina pectoris?
Ivabradine provides consistent reduction in cardiovascular outcomes for patients with systolic heart failure, regardless of the presence of concomitant angina.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Subgroup effect inconclusive in HF with angina; extends overall RCT evidence without confirming interaction.
OBJECTIVES: In the Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the If Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial (SHIFT), slowing of the heart rate with ivabradine reduced cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalizations among patients with systolic chronic heart failure (CHF). Subsequently, in the Study Assessing the Morbidity-Mortality Benefits of the If Inhibitor Ivabradine in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease (SIGNIFY) slowing of the heart rate in patients without CHF provided no benefit for cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (primary composite end point), with secondary analyses suggesting possible harm in the angina subgroup. Therefore, we examined the impact of ivabradine in the patients with CHF plus angina in SHIFT. METHODS: SHIFT enrolled adults with stable, symptomatic CHF, a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% and a sinus rhythm with a resting heart rate ≥70 bpm. Outcomes were the SHIFT and SIGNIFY primary composite end points and their components. RESULTS: Of 6,505 patients in SHIFT, 2,220 (34%) reported angina at randomization. Ivabradine numerically, but not significantly, reduced the SIGNIFY primary composite end point by 8, 11 and 11% in the SHIFT angina subgroup, nonangina subgroup and overall population, respectively. Ivabradine also reduced the SHIFT primary composite end point in all 3 subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In SHIFT, ivabradine showed consistent reduction of cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CHF; similar results were seen in the subgroup of SHIFT patients with angina.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borer et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Systolic chronic heart failure with or without angina (n=6,505). Ivabradine was evaluated on Cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (SIGNIFY primary composite) and cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalizations (SHIFT primary composite). Ivabradine numerically but not significantly reduced cardiovascular death or nonfatal myocardial infarction by 8% in the subgroup of heart failure patients with angina.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: