Key result
Verapamil showed no direct cytoprotective effect, while diltiazem was significantly toxic to alveolar type II cells during cold ischaemia (P<0.05), suggesting protection is via vasodilatation.
Why the study?
Does verapamil or diltiazem improve cell viability in alveolar type II cells during metabolic ischaemia?
Does verapamil or diltiazem improve cell viability in alveolar type II cells during metabolic ischaemia?
The protective effect of calcium channel blockers during ischaemia is likely due to vasodilation rather than a direct cytoprotective effect on alveolar type II cells.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support direct cytoprotection by calcium channel blockers in alveolar ischaemia; leaves open vasodilatation mechanisms for clinical translation.
The alteration of cytosolic free calcium concentration is an important event during cellular ischaemia. Calcium channel blockers have been shown to be beneficial during experimental ischaemic organ protection. To investigate the mechanisms of this protection, the behaviour of type II pneumocyte cultures, subjected to warm and cold metabolic ischaemia (6 h), was studied. The cells were incubated in electrolytic solutions and treated with high doses of verapamil (10 mg/l) or diltiazem (100 mg/l). Alveolar type II epithelial cells were removed from adult rat lungs using the modified Dobbs' method. Cell viability was determined by analysis of the total protein content, and from the rate of protein synthesis as indicated by the [35S]methionine uptake assay. The results show that verapamil does not have a direct cytoprotective or cytotoxic effect on the incubated cells, but diltiazem seems to be toxic to the cells, especially during cold ischaemia when the toxicity is significant (P < 0.05). Thus, the protection from ischaemia previously attributed to calcium channel blockers is ascribed to action on the blood vessels resulting in vasodilatation, rather than to a direct influence on cytosolic free calcium homeostasis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spaggiari et al. (1994) studied Metabolic ischaemia. Verapamil and Diltiazem vs. Electrolytic solutions was evaluated on Cell viability (total protein content and rate of protein synthesis) (p=< 0.05). Verapamil showed no direct cytoprotective effect, while diltiazem was significantly toxic to alveolar type II cells during cold ischaemia (P<0.05), suggesting protection is via vasodilatation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: