Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigated the cellular uptake of fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled mesoporous silica nanoparticles (FITC-MSNs), amine-functionalised FITC-MSNs (AP-FITC-MSNs) and their gallic acid (GA)-loaded counterparts. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles were labelled with fluorescein isothiocyanate, functionalised by 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) (AP-FITC-MSNs) and then loaded by GA. All nanoparticles were characterised by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. The cytotoxicity of different concentrations of dyed nanoparticles was investigated using (3-(4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid, dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay and flow cytometry. TEM images showed that the average particle sizes of FITC-MSNs and AP-FITC-MSNs were about 100 and 110 nm, respectively. These nanoparticles were internalised by Caco-2 cells, accumulated and dispersed into the cytoplasm, nucleus, and subcellular organelles. Nanoparticles containing GA clearly decreased the viability of cells. FITC-MSNs showed no toxicity on Caco-2 cells at concentrations of ≤50 µg/ml. Functionalisation of FITC-MSNs using APTES decreased toxicity effects on the cells. It was found that FITC-MSNs can be applied at low concentrations as a marker in the cells. In addition, AP-FITC-MSNs showed better biocompatibility with Caco-2 cells than FITC-MSNs, because of their positive surface charges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rashidi et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: