Why the study?
Transcatheter aortic valve in valve (Aviv) replacement is effective for failed bioprostheses, but contemporary 1-year outcomes in recent studies needed evaluation.
Does transcatheter aortic valve in valve (Aviv) replacement improve outcomes in patients with failed aortic bioprosthetic valves?
Systematic Review (n=3,339)
Yes
Does transcatheter aortic valve in valve (Aviv) replacement improve outcomes in patients with failed aortic bioprosthetic valves?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve replacement is an effective and safe alternative to redo surgical aortic valve replacement for patients with failed bioprostheses, demonstrating acceptable 1-year outcomes.
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve in valve (Aviv) replacement has been shown to be an effective therapeutic option in patients with failed aortic bioprosthetic valves. This review intended to evaluate contemporary 1-year outcomes of Aviv in recent studies. Methods: A systematic review on outcomes of Aviv was performed using the best available evidence from studies obtained using a MEDLINE, Cochrane database, and SCOPUS search. Endpoints of interest were survival, coronary artery obstruction, prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM), stroke, pacemaker implantation, and structural valve deterioration. Results: A total of 3339 patients from 23 studies were included. Mean age was 68-80 years, 20%-50% were female, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score ranged from 5.7 to 31.1. Thirty-day all-cause mortality ranged from 2% to 8%, and 1-year all-cause mortality ranged from 8% to 33%. Coronary artery obstruction risk after Aviv ranged from 0.6% to 4%. One-year stroke ranged from 2% to 8%. Moderate-severe PPM occurred in 11%-58%, and pacemaker rate at 1 year ranged from 5% to 12%. Conclusion: Transcatheter aortic ViV has emerged as an effective therapeutic option to treat patients with failed bioprostheses. The acceptable complication rate and favorable 1-year outcomes make Aviv an appropriate alternative to redo surgical aortic valve replacement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sabbagh et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Failed aortic bioprosthetic valves (n=3,339). Transcatheter aortic valve in valve (Aviv) replacement was evaluated on 1-year all-cause mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: