Key result
Negative results from rapid bedside testing for troponin-T and troponin-I were insufficient to rule out short-term risks in all subgroups of patients with chest pain.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This letter discusses the limitations of rapid bedside troponin testing for ruling out short-term risks in emergency department patients with chest pain.
Letters1 July 1998Critical Pathway for Chest PainThomas H. Lee, MD and Graham Nichol, MDThomas H. Lee, MDPartners Community Health Care, Inc.; Boston, MA 02199University of Ottawa; Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, CanadaSearch for more papers by this author and Graham Nichol, MDPartners Community Health Care, Inc.; Boston, MA 02199University of Ottawa; Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, CanadaSearch for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-129-1-199807010-00019 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail IN RESPONSE:We appreciate that evidence of the potential role of rapid bedside testing in patients with chest pain in the emergency department is rapidly evolving. Dr. Bosch cites a non-experimental study of use of troponin-T and troponin-I. However, negative test results were insufficient to rule out short-term risks in all subgroups.The other studies that he cites are worth considering further. Lindahl and colleagues assessed troponin T in patients with crescendo angina or ischemia on electrocardiography. The sensitivity of troponin T was overestimated because testing was conducted up to 24 hours after symptom onset. Furthermore, another prospective study [1] ...References1. Brogan GX Jr, Hollander JE, McCuskey CF, Thode HC, Snow J, Sama A, et al. Evaluation of a new assay for cardiac troponin I vs creatine kinase-MB for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The Biochemical Markers for Acute Myocardial Ischemia (BAMI) Study Group. Acad Emerg Med. 1997; 4:6-12. Google Scholar2. Lachs MS, Nachamkin I, Edelstein PH, Goldman J, Feinstein AR, Schwartz JS. Spectrum bias in the evaluation of diagnostic tests: lessons from the rapid dipstick test for urinary tract infection. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 117:135-40. Google Scholar Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAffiliations: Partners Community Health Care, Inc.; Boston, MA 02199University of Ottawa; Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4E9, Canada PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Metrics 1 July 1998Volume 129, Issue 1Page: 70-71KeywordsEmergency departmentEvidence based medicineIschemiaMyocardial infarctionPatientsProspective studiesSpecificityTroponinTroponin TUnstable angina Issue Published: 1 July 1998 CopyrightCopyright © 1998 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF DownloadLoading ...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas H. Lee (1998) conducted a letter in chest pain. rapid bedside testing (troponin-T and troponin-I) was evaluated. Negative results from rapid bedside testing for troponin-T and troponin-I were insufficient to rule out short-term risks in all subgroups of patients with chest pain.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: