Key result
High-level production of the serotype O FMDV VP1 epitope fused to GST was achieved in E. coli, yielding approximately 11 g from a 2.9-l culture, which successfully induced an immune response in rabbits.
High-yield production of the FMDV VP1 epitope in E. coli is feasible and immunogenic, potentially aiding in vaccine and diagnostic development.
May enable scalable FMDV vaccine antigen production; leaves open efficacy and safety in livestock.
For effective control of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), the development of rapid diagnostic systems and vaccines are required against its etiological agent, FMD virus (FMDV). To accomplish this, efficient large-scale expression of the FMDV VP1 protein, with high solubility, needs to be optimized. We attempted to produce high levels of a serotype O FMDV VP1 epitope in Escherichia coli. We identified the subtype-independent serotype O FMDV VP1 epitope sequence and used it to construct a glutathione S-transferase (GST) fusion protein. For efficient production of the FMDV VP1 epitope fused to GST (VP1e-GST), four E. coli strains and three temperatures were examined. The conditions yielding the greatest level of VP1e-GST with highest solubility were achieved with E. coli BL21(DE3) at 25 °C. For high-level production, fed-batch cultures were conducted in 5-l bioreactors. When cells were induced at a high density and complex feeding solutions were supplied, approximately 11 g of VP1e-GST was obtained from a 2.9-l culture. Following purification, the VP1 epitope was used to immunize rabbits, and we confirmed that it induced an immune response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jung et al. (2013) studied Foot-and-mouth disease. FMDV VP1 epitope fused to GST (VP1e-GST) was evaluated on Protein production yield and immune response induction. High-level production of the serotype O FMDV VP1 epitope fused to GST was achieved in E. coli, yielding approximately 11 g from a 2.9-l culture, which successfully induced an immune response in rabbits.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: