Key result
Different methods of stromal vascular fraction isolation have advantages and disadvantages, with automatic medical devices using standardized physical force impact being the most promising direction.
The review highlights the need for automated medical devices with standardized physical force impact to obtain high-quality stromal vascular fraction products.
SVF isolation lacks standardization; leaves open whether automated devices improve product quality or clinical outcomes.
Thirty-four Russian and foreign articles on the subject have been analyzed. Adipose-derived stromal cells isolation methods and comparative analysis of different lipoaspirate based products is described. Comparative characteristic of different stromal vascular fraction isolation devices is given in the article as well. Different methods of stromal vascular fraction isolation have advantages and disadvantages. Currently the most promising direction is development of an automatic medical device with standardized physical force impact that allows to obtaining high-quality product with predictable physical and biological properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eremin et al. (2023) reported a review. Stromal vascular fraction isolation methods was evaluated. Different methods of stromal vascular fraction isolation have advantages and disadvantages, with automatic medical devices using standardized physical force impact being the most promising direction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: