Key result
Higher estimated intensity of chest pain at prehospital assessment was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of a final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (adjusted OR 1.13 per VAS unit).
Why the study?
Early assessment of ACS is important to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and avoid complications, prompting investigation into the relationship between prehospital chest pain intensity and subsequent outcomes.
Does higher reported intensity of chest pain at first prehospital assessment predict worse subsequent outcomes in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome?
Population
1603 patients with suspected ACS and pain intensity ≥4 on visual analogue scale
Comparison
Estimated intensity of chest pain at prehospital assessment
Design
Combined prospective and retrospective observational study
Follow-up
three years
Authors
Loading...
May refine prehospital triage in suspected ACS; leaves open value for mortality prediction or practice change.
Observational (n=1,603)
Yes
Does higher reported intensity of chest pain at first prehospital assessment predict worse subsequent outcomes in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome?
Odds Ratio: 1.13 (95% CI 1.04–1.23)
Absolute Event Rate: 33.1% vs 22.4%
p-value: p=0.003
Higher self-reported chest pain intensity in the prehospital setting is associated with a higher likelihood of acute myocardial infarction and in-hospital complications, but does not predict short- or long-term mortality.
Holmberg et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Acute chest pain and presumed acute coronary syndrome (n=1,603). Higher estimated intensity of chest pain (VAS score) vs. Lower estimated intensity of chest pain was evaluated on Final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04-1.23, p=0.003). Higher estimated intensity of chest pain at prehospital assessment was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of a final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (adjusted OR 1.13 per VAS unit).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: