Key result
Strict home blood pressure control to <125/75 mm Hg was associated with low rates of uncontrolled 24-hour (7.0%) and nighttime (15.3%) ambulatory blood pressure in treated hypertension.
Why the study?
No studies had used the same device to investigate 24-hour BP control status in relation to different home BP control thresholds.
Do different home blood pressure thresholds predict 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure control in patients with treated hypertension?
Cross-Sectional (n=2,269)
Yes
Do different home blood pressure thresholds predict 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure control in patients with treated hypertension?
A stricter home blood pressure target of <125/75 mm Hg is associated with better 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure control, particularly for nocturnal hypertension, compared to standard targets.
Stricter home BP thresholds better predict 24-hour control; leaves open whether <125/75 mm Hg improves outcomes in treated hypertension.
BACKGROUND: Home blood pressure (BP) is an important component of digital strategies for hypertension management. However, no studies have used the same device to investigate 24-hour BP control status in relation to different home BP control thresholds. METHODS: Participants in the general practitioner-based, multicenter HI-JAMP study (Home-Activity Information and Communication Technology-Based Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective) underwent office BP measurement, then 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, then home BP monitoring for 5 days. A validated all-in-one BP monitoring device was used to measure office, home, and ambulatory BP. Baseline data were used to investigate ambulatory BP control status in individuals with well-controlled home BP based on the different guideline thresholds (125/75 mm Hg, 130/80 mm Hg, and 135/85 mm Hg). RESULTS: Data from 2269 patients were analyzed. For individuals with well-controlled home BP <135/85 mm Hg (59.5% of the total population), the prevalence of uncontrolled 24-hour (≥130/80 mm Hg), daytime (≥135/85 mm Hg), and nighttime ambulatory BP (≥120/70 mm Hg) was 19.9%, 18.5%, and 33.6%, respectively. Corresponding prevalence rates in the 42.7% of participants with well-controlled home BP <130/80 mm Hg were 13.4%, 12.9%, and 26.0%, and when well-controlled home BP was strictly defined as <125/75 mm Hg (23.9% of the population), prevalence of rates of uncontrolled 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP were 7.0%, 9.0%, and 15.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Home BP control status defined using different thresholds could predict 24-hour ambulatory BP control status in treated hypertension. One-third of individuals still had uncontrolled nocturnal hypertension when home BP was controlled to <135/85 mm Hg, but ambulatory BP was quite well controlled when home BP was <125/75 mm Hg.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kario et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in treated hypertension (n=2,269). Home blood pressure control thresholds was evaluated on Uncontrolled 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory blood pressure. Strict home blood pressure control to <125/75 mm Hg was associated with low rates of uncontrolled 24-hour (7.0%) and nighttime (15.3%) ambulatory blood pressure in treated hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: