Key result
Patients with fulminant myocarditis had significantly higher myocardial edema rates (2.6 vs 1.6) and late gadolinium enhancement mass (16.5g vs 6.9g) than those with nonfulminant acute myocarditis (P<0.001).
Why the study?
The clinical value of novel mapping techniques and strain measures to assess myocardial inflammation in fulminant myocarditis has not been fully explored.
Does mapping and strain cardiac MRI differentiate myocardial inflammation in fulminant myocarditis compared to nonfulminant acute myocarditis?
Observational (n=58)
Does mapping and strain cardiac MRI differentiate myocardial inflammation in fulminant myocarditis compared to nonfulminant acute myocarditis?
Absolute Event Rate: 2.6% vs 1.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
Cardiac MRI mapping and strain analysis reveal significantly increased edema and decreased strain in fulminant myocarditis compared to nonfulminant cases, highlighting its utility in assessing myocardial inflammation.
Supports CMR mapping and strain to distinguish fulminant from nonfulminant myocarditis; leaves open impact on risk stratification or therapy.
Background The clinical value of novel mapping techniques and strain measures to assess myocardial inflammation in fulminant myocarditis (FM) has not been fully explored. Purpose To evaluate the ability of mapping and strain cardiac MRI to assess myocardial inflammation in patients with FM, and to which degree the strain metrics correlate with myocardial edema. Study Type Prospective. Population Twenty‐nine patients (37 ± 16 years, 48% male) with FM and 29 patients with nonfulminant acute myocarditis (NFAM) (29 ± 14 years, 69% male). Field Strength/Sequence 3.0T; Cine imaging, black blood T2‐weighted imaging, T1mapping, T2 mapping, and late gadolinium enhancement. Assessment Native T1, extracellular volume (ECV), and T2 were measured. Myocardial strain was evaluated by feature tracking. Statistical Tests Student's t‐ or Mann–Whitney U‐test. Spearman correlation analysis. Results The myocardial edema rate (2.6 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.2, P < 0.001) and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) mass (16.5 [11.7, 41.7] vs. 6.9 [2.2, 15.8] g, P < 0.001) were significantly increased in FM patients when compared to the NFAM group. LGE in the FM group was predominantly located in the septal wall, and 38% of the patients showed a diffuse LGE pattern. Native T1, ECV, and T2 values in the FM group were significantly more elevated than those with NFAM, while global peak radial, circumferential, and longitudinal strain values were significantly reduced (all P < 0.001). Circumferential strain showed the strongest correlations with ECV (r = 0.72, P < 0.001). Data Conclusion Patients with FM showed significant differences in LGE patterns, increased edema, and decreased strain measurements compared to those with NFAM. Circumferential strain showed significant associations with quantitative cardiac MRI parameters of myocardial inflammation. Level of Evidence 2 Technical Efficacy Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;52:930–938.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Fulminant myocarditis (n=58). Fulminant myocarditis vs. Nonfulminant acute myocarditis was evaluated on Myocardial edema rate (p=<0.001). Patients with fulminant myocarditis had significantly higher myocardial edema rates (2.6 vs 1.6) and late gadolinium enhancement mass (16.5g vs 6.9g) than those with nonfulminant acute myocarditis (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: