Key result
IIM with preserved LVEF is linked to subclinical myocardial involvement with elevated native T1 vs controls.
Why the study?
The role of cardiac magnetic resonance mapping and strain analysis in identifying cardiac involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients with preserved LVEF was unclear.
Do CMR mapping and strain parameters detect subclinical myocardial involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients with preserved LVEF?
Case-Control (n=61)
No
Do CMR mapping and strain parameters detect subclinical myocardial involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients with preserved LVEF?
CMR mapping and strain analysis can detect subclinical myocardial involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy patients even when left ventricular ejection fraction is preserved.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CMR mapping may detect subclinical myocardial involvement in IIM with preserved LVEF; leaves open prognostic and therapeutic implications.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) mapping and strain analysis in the identification of cardiac involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 38 IIM patients who underwent CMR examination at our institution were retrospectively included. Twenty-three age-matched healthy individuals served as controls. Mapping parameters including native T1, extracellular volume (ECV), and T2 mapping and strain parameters including global radial strain, global circumferential strain, and global longitudinal strain were measured semiautomatically using a dedicated processing software. All the mapping and strain values were compared between patients and controls. RESULTS: Late gadolinium enhancement was only present in IIM patients (n=17, 44.7%). IIM patients showed higher native T1 (1346 vs. 1269 ms, P<0.001), ECV (31.1% vs. 27.4%, P<0.01), and higher T2 (44.4 vs. 39.2 ms, P<0.001) values compared with controls. The global radial strain (36.7% vs. 46.9%, P<0.001), global circumferential strain (-21.2% vs. -24.1%, P<0.01), and global longitudinal strain (-13.6% vs. -15.6%, P<0.05) values were significantly reduced compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Native T1, ECV, T2 values, and global strain values may hold promise for the detection of subclinical myocardial involvement in IIM patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) conducted a case-control in Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (n=61). Idiopathic inflammatory myopathy vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Native T1 mapping value (p=<0.001). Compared with healthy controls, IIM patients with preserved LVEF showed higher native T1, ECV, and T2 values, indicating subclinical myocardial involvement.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: