Key result
Chronic heart failure patients exhibited significantly greater phase variation between cardiovascular and respiratory signals during paced breathing at 0.15 Hz compared to controls (46 vs 6 degrees, P<0.01).
Why the study?
Does voluntary paced-breathing reveal altered cardiorespiratory synchronization in patients with moderate chronic heart failure compared to controls?
Case-Control (n=20)
random-order
Does voluntary paced-breathing reveal altered cardiorespiratory synchronization in patients with moderate chronic heart failure compared to controls?
Absolute Event Rate: 46% vs 6%
p-value: p=<0.01
Patients with moderate chronic heart failure demonstrate significant uncoupling between cardiovascular and respiratory neuronal activities during paced breathing.
Paced breathing may unmask cardiorespiratory uncoupling in moderate HF; hypothesis-generating for synchronization metrics as biomarkers, requiring prospective validation.
AIMS: With the complex demodulation (CDM) method, we assessed the instantaneous amplitude and frequency of cardiovascular (CV) and respiratory oscillations, and the instant phase (IP) between the CV and respiratory signals using respiration as a periodic forced stimulation. We hypothesised a possible lack of synchronisation between CV and respiratory signals under regular breathing at different frequencies. METHODS: RR interval (ECG), blood pressure (SBP/DBP, Finapress), respiration (Respitrace) were monitored during two random-order periods of voluntary paced-breathing (0.15 Hz/0.25 Hz) in 10 moderate CHF patients and 10 age-matched controls. The CDM method provides the amplitude and frequency of a particular spectral component as a function of time in both LF and HF bands. IP between CV and respiratory oscillations was assessed using the real modulating breathing rate. RESULTS: (i) Continuous phase variations between CV oscillations and the respiratory signal were evidenced in CHF patients, the slower the breathing rate, the greater the phase variation (RR/Resp; 0.25 Hz, 23+/-17 degrees; 0.15 Hz, 46+/-57 degrees, P<0.01; RR/Resp at 0.15 Hz 6+/-3 vs. 46+/-57 P<0.01 controls vs. CHF). Phase was constant in controls. (ii) In patients, the instant amplitude of the cardiovascular oscillations in the high frequency domain is more markedly altered when the breathing rate was slowed down as compared to controls. CONCLUSION: The lack of synchronisation between physiological signals during voluntary breathing in CHF patients highlights a central uncoupling between CV and respiratory neuronal activities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mangin et al. (2002) conducted a case-control in Chronic Heart Failure (n=20). Chronic Heart Failure vs. Age-matched controls was evaluated on Phase variation between cardiovascular oscillations and respiratory signal (RR/Resp) at 0.15 Hz (p=<0.01). Chronic heart failure patients exhibited significantly greater phase variation between cardiovascular and respiratory signals during paced breathing at 0.15 Hz compared to controls (46 vs 6 degrees, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: