Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Under severe impact loading, conventional concrete structures have a relatively simple material system and lack an internal buffering layer. As a result, stress waves are weakly reflected and scattered within the structure, impact energy is transmitted mainly through the thickness, and the available energy-dissipation paths are limited. These limitations restrict their ability to meet the demands of modern protective engineering. To improve impact-energy dissipation and protective performance, this study proposes an aluminum foam panel-reinforced concrete (AFPRC) layered composite structure. Static flexural tests, drop-weight impact tests, and electromagnetic split Hopkinson pressure bar (ESHPB) tests were conducted to compare the energy-dissipation behavior of open-cell aluminum foam panel-reinforced concrete (OAFPRC) and closed-cell aluminum foam panel-reinforced concrete (CAFPRC). For the tested 5 mm open-cell and closed-cell aluminum foam panel configurations, specimen dimensions, and loading conditions, the maximum static flexural load of the structure increased by 42.11% compared with plain concrete (PC), and the final-failure impact energy was approximately 4.81 times the PC value. At 3000 V, CAFPRC reached a reflected energy of 856 J, clearly higher than that of PC, while the mass fraction of large fragments after failure increased from 35.8% to 64.5%, indicating a lower degree of fragmentation. The results show that the proposed structure provides improved energy dissipation and impact protection, and may serve as a reference for experimental studies and preliminary design of similar layered protective systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: