Key result
Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility was associated with a significantly higher frequency of joint hypermobility compared to controls (50% vs 13%; RR 2.06; 95% CI 1.27-3.35; p < .01).
Why the study?
Hypermobility is common in central core disease but only sporadically described in malignant hyperthermia, prompting investigation of its frequency and characteristics in malignant hyperthermia susceptible patients.
Is joint hypermobility more frequent in malignant hyperthermia susceptible patients compared to healthy controls?
Case-Control
Is joint hypermobility more frequent in malignant hyperthermia susceptible patients compared to healthy controls?
Relative Risk: 2.06 (95% CI 1.27–3.35)
Absolute Event Rate: 50% vs 13%
p-value: p=< .01
Joint hypermobility is significantly more frequent in malignant hyperthermia susceptible patients compared to controls, suggesting a phenotypic link.
Hypermobility was more frequent in MH-susceptible patients; leaves open RYR1 spectrum association and requires prospective validation before clinical consideration.
Background: Hypermobility is the capacity to perform joint movements in amplitudes greater than normal. Hypermobility is present in nearly 100 % of congenital myopathy central core disease (CCD) patients but is sporadically described in the allelic disease malignant hyperthermia (MH). Our objective was to investigate the frequency/characteristics of hypermobility in MH susceptible patients as compared to a control group, aiming the identification of correlations between hypermobility and demographic/clinical findings in MH patients. Methods: contracture test (IVCT), no muscle weakness, no cores in muscle biopsy) and 23 controls (no MH/myopathy history). Patients/medical records were evaluated for obtaining demographic/clinical data. Hypermobility was assessed in all patients and controls with Bulbena score. Goniometry was performed in a subset of 11 patients and 11 controls. Results: Bulbena score indicative of hypermobility was significantly more frequent in MH than in the control group (50 % versus 13 %, relative risk 2.06 (95%CI 1.27-3.35), chi-square test, p < .01). Goniometric assessment revealed significantly greater range of motion of mostly proximal movements in MH versus control groups. In the MH group, there was no correlation of the Bulbena score with age, sex, clinical complaints of myalgia/cramps, CK levels, IVCT result, or degree of contracture after caffeine or halothane. Conclusions: gene variants, as it was present even when associated muscle weakness was not present. More studies are necessary to measure evolution and long-term impact of hypermobility in MH patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santos et al. (2025) conducted a case-control in Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility vs. Controls (no MH/myopathy history) was evaluated on Hypermobility assessed by Bulbena score (RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.27-3.35, p=< .01). Malignant hyperthermia susceptibility was associated with a significantly higher frequency of joint hypermobility compared to controls (50% vs 13%; RR 2.06; 95% CI 1.27-3.35; p < .01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: