Key result
Intensive plaque modification with rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon increased acute lumen cross-sectional area gain after PCI compared to rotational atherectomy with a plain balloon.
Why the study?
Does intensive plaque modification with rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon improve acute lumen gain in patients with severely calcified coronary lesions?
RCT (n=71)
Open-label
Random sequence generated by a computer program
Yes
Does intensive plaque modification with rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon improve acute lumen gain in patients with severely calcified coronary lesions?
Intensive plaque modification with rotational atherectomy and a cutting balloon significantly improves acute lumen gain and reduces 1-year MACE in severely calcified coronary lesions compared to standard rotational atherectomy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
RA plus cutting balloon may improve stent expansion and reduce 1-year events in calcified lesions; leaves open efficacy in larger trials.
BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether, for patients with severely calcified coronary lesions, use of a cutting balloon (CB) during rotational atherectomy (RA) before placing a drug-eluting stent will improve periprocedural outcomes, compared to RA with a conventional plain balloon. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial, patients with severely calcified lesions of calcium arc ≥180° were apportioned to receive intensive plaque modification with RA and CB (RA + CB; n = 35) or RA with conventional plain balloon (RA; n = 36). Intravascular ultrasound was applied for quantitative or qualitative analyses of percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes. The primary outcome was acute lumen gain after drug-eluting stent. RESULTS: The RA + CB and RA groups were similar in baseline mean arcs of superficial calcium, and minimum lumen cross-sectional areas (CSAs). The mean minimum stent CSA after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the RA + CB group (5.9 ± 1.7 mm(2)) was significantly larger than that of the RA group (5.0 ± 1.4 mm(2); P = 0.021). Patients in the RA + CB group achieved significantly larger acute CSA gain after PCI (4.5 ± 1.5 mm(2)) relative to the RA group (3.8 ± 1.5 mm(2); P = 0.035). The groups were similar in rates of periprocedural complications, but at the 1-year follow-up the RA + CB had a lower rate of revascularization for restenosis of the target vessel and MACE (5.7 %) than did the RA group (22.2 %, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Aggressive plaque preparation with RA and CB seems to be safe and effective for patients with severely calcified coronary lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ChiCTR-INR-16008274 . Retrospectively registered 12 April 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Severely calcified coronary lesions (n=71). Rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon vs. Rotational atherectomy and conventional plain balloon was evaluated on Acute lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) gain after drug-eluting stent implantation (p=0.035). Intensive plaque modification with rotational atherectomy and cutting balloon increased acute lumen cross-sectional area gain after PCI compared to rotational atherectomy with a plain balloon.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: