Key result
Cutting balloon use after rotational atherectomy increased calcium fracture (OR 30.0; 95% CI 2.7-994.1; p=0.004) and stent expansion (78.9% vs 66.7%; p<0.01) compared to a conventional balloon.
Why the study?
A cutting balloon is designed to create discrete incisions to facilitate fracture of severely calcified plaque, but its effect compared with a conventional balloon after rotational atherectomy and before stenting was evaluated using OCT.
Does cutting balloon predilation after rotational atherectomy improve calcium fracture and stent expansion in severely calcified coronary lesions compared to conventional balloon?
Cohort (n=41)
Does cutting balloon predilation after rotational atherectomy improve calcium fracture and stent expansion in severely calcified coronary lesions compared to conventional balloon?
Odds Ratio: 30 (95% CI 2.7–994.1)
p-value: p=0.004
Using a cutting balloon after rotational atherectomy in severely calcified coronary lesions significantly improves calcium fracture and stent expansion compared to a conventional balloon.
May support cutting balloon after rotational atherectomy; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice without RCTs.
OBJECTIVES: Using optical coherence tomography (OCT), we evaluated the effect of a cutting balloon (CB) compared with a conventional balloon after rotational atherectomy (RA) and before stenting in severely calcified coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: A CB is designed to create discrete incisions to facilitate fracture of severely calcified plaque. METHODS: OCT was performed preintervention (if possible), post-RA, and poststent implantation. RA modification of calcium was defined as a polished, concave, round-shaped surface. Calcium fracture was defined as a break in the calcium plate. The effects of calcium modification and stent expansion between CB (n = 18) versus conventional balloon (n = 23) following RA were compared. RESULTS: Median patient age was 72 years with 24% on hemodialysis. The amount of calcium and the length of RA modification were comparable between the CB and conventional balloon groups. Final poststent OCT showed that the number and thickness of calcium fracture were greater after CB versus conventional balloon, resulting better stent expansion (78.9% [IQR: 72.4-88.1] vs. 66.7% [IQR: 55.0-76.7], p < 0.01). In the multivariable model, after adjusting for the amount of calcium, CB use was an independent predictor of the presence of calcium fracture (odds ratio 30.0; 95% confidence interval 2.7-994.1, p = 0.004) and an independent predictor for greater stent expansion (regression coefficient 7.4; 95% confidence interval 0.5-14.3, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In severely calcified lesions calcium fracture was more often associated with RA followed by CB compared with RA followed by conventional balloon predilation before stenting. CB use was also a determinant of greater stent expansion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amemiya et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Severely calcified coronary artery lesions (n=41). Cutting balloon after rotational atherectomy vs. Conventional balloon after rotational atherectomy was evaluated on Presence of calcium fracture (OR 30.0, 95% CI 2.7-994.1, p=0.004). Cutting balloon use after rotational atherectomy increased calcium fracture (OR 30.0; 95% CI 2.7-994.1; p=0.004) and stent expansion (78.9% vs 66.7%; p<0.01) compared to a conventional balloon.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: