Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted disease (STD) in the United States. The development of nucleic acid amplification tests for C trachomatis in urine specimens allows for screening outside traditional clinic settings. Persons visiting an HIV counseling and testing site may be at increased risk for STDs, including C trachomatis. GOAL: To measure the acceptance of C trachomatis urine screening and the prevalence of C trachomatis infection among clients at an HIV counseling and testing site. STUDY DESIGN: Site HIV counselors offered urine C trachomatis screening to clients, administered a questionnaire, and collected urine samples. RESULTS: Of 808 counseling and testing site clients approached for C trachomatis screening, 572 (71%) accepted. The most common reasons for declining screening were absence of symptoms (33%) and recent STD testing (32%). Men were more likely to accept urine screening than women (risk ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.06-1.62), as were clients who practiced oral sex, had a history of STD, or who had never been screened for STD. Of 560 urine specimens processed, only 8 (1.43%; 95% CI, 0.66-2.91%) were infected with C trachomatis. CONCLUSIONS: Sites offering HIV testing and counseling are a feasible alternative to clinical settings for C trachomatis screening. Prevalence may be too low for screening to be cost effective unless higher-risk subpopulations can be identified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamel et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: