Case series demonstrates rapid serum baclofen clearance using in-series hemoperfusion and hemodialysis in poisoned dogs, highlighting an effective extracorporeal therapy for severe toxicosis.
OBJECTIVE: To report serum baclofen concentrations before, during, and after in-series carbon hemoperfusion (cHP) and hemodialysis (HD) in four dogs with severe baclofen toxicosis. SERIES SUMMARY: This series involves four dogs with serum samples collected before, during, and after in-series cHP/HD. The extraction ratio (ER, %) of cHP and HD, half-life during cHP/HD, and total extracorporeal elimination constant were calculated. Posttreatment samples were collected to determine endogenous half-life and intrinsic elimination constant. Two dogs received both cHP/HD and mechanical ventilation, while the other two received cHP/HD alone. The range of ingested dosages was 4-24 mg/kg. The median time from suspected ingestion to cHP/HD initiation was 7 h (range: 5-15 h). Extracorporeal therapy was performed using an intermittent hemodialysis platform in two cases and a continuous renal replacement therapy platform in two cases. The median duration of cHP/HD was 3 h (range: 2.2-4 h), with a median total blood volume processed of 1.3 L/kg (range: 1-1.5 L/kg), equating to 15 times (range: 12-18.2 times) the estimated blood volume (80 mL/kg) in dogs. Serum baclofen concentration was reduced during cHP/HD by a median 69% (range: 46%-80%). The median ER for cHP was 61% (range: 60%-81%) and for HD was 4% (range: -0.5% to 11.5%). The calculated half-life during cHP/HD was 1.9 h (range: 1.1-2.5 h), compared with 5.8 h (range: 3.1-13.6 h) after cHP/HD. The median extracorporeal elimination constant was 0.34 (range: 0.08-0.37), which was 2.8 times faster than the intrinsic elimination constant of 0.12 (range: 0.05-0.23). NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED: In-series cHP/HD reduced serum baclofen concentrations in this small series of dogs, highlighting its potential role in the treatment of severe baclofen intoxication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spillane et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: