Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conceptual review explores tailored therapeutic approaches in psychoanalysis, highlighting the necessity of grounded self-understanding to distinctively guide individualized patient care.
Thomas Ogden has been at the forefront of creative, original analytic thought and practice for more than 40 years. Ogden’s agenda is clearly stated in the title of his paper, i.e., that the analyst should endeavour to ‘invent’ a new approach to psychoanalysis with every patient. However, Ogden is not advocating for an ‘anything goes’ approach to this process of invention. Before we can ‘invent’ a new psychoanalysis with each patient, Ogden suggests that the analyst should come to a self‐understanding of: What does it mean to become a psychoanalyst? What is definitive of psychoanalytic thinking? What is distinctive practising psychoanalysis? We could consider “Inventing a New Psychoanalysis with Each Patient” a succinct distillation of his previous reflections on what it means to be a psychoanalyst and to ‘practise’ psychoanalysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mark Winborn (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: