Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study reveals accurate logarithmic velocity profile reconstruction using low-cost tilt current meters, indicating scalable shallow-water hydrodynamic monitoring.
Near-bed mean-flow structure is important to bottom-boundary-layer exchange and sediment-related processes in shallow coastal waters, but vertically resolved observations often require costly acoustic instrumentation. This proof-of-concept study evaluates a scalable framework using one or two tilt current meters (TCMs) for near-bed logarithmic-profile reconstruction. A short (L1) and long (L2) inclinometer were evaluated individually, and their simultaneous measurements at different effective heights were combined into a two-height reconstruction (L3). Reference profiles were obtained from eight sequential Nortek Vector acoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) profiles in Bahia de La Paz, Mexico. Reconstructions used a baseline hydraulic roughness length z0 = 0.015 m, with sensitivity over 0.001–0.015 m. L1 and L2 showed median absolute point-wise velocity errors of 0.0281 and 0.0290 m s−1, while L3 reduced this metric to 0.0213 m s−1. Friction–velocity ratios relative to the ADV were 1.13, 0.91, and 0.99 for L1, L2, and L3, respectively, indicating that relative performance depended on the metric considered. An individual TCM represented approximately 9–10% of the quoted ADV instrument price. The framework supports tiered, spatially replicated monitoring when logarithmic-profile assumptions are appropriate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández-Casas et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: