Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
February 1, 2000European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgeryOpen Access

Reoperative surgery for degenerated aortic bioprostheses: predictors for emergency surgery and reoperative mortality

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Emergency reoperation for degenerated aortic bioprostheses was associated with significantly higher operative mortality compared to elective replacement (22.6% vs 1.4%; P<0.0001).

Why the study?

Does emergency reoperation compared to elective reoperation increase operative mortality in patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses?

Population

172 patients who had their first bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement between 1975 and 1988 and underwent…

Comparison

Emergency reoperation for degenerated aortic… vs Elective reoperation for degenerated aortic…

Design

Cohort

Authors

PVPeter VogtJoint Research Centre
Hans‐Peter Brunner‐La Rocca
Hans‐Peter Brunner‐La RoccaHeart Failure / Cardiomyopathy
PSPatrick SidlerUniversity Hospital of Zurich

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Supports early detection of bioprosthetic failure to enable elective reoperation; leaves open prospective validation of timing strategies.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=172)

Structured PICO

Does emergency reoperation compared to elective reoperation increase operative mortality in patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses?

P
Population
172 patients (mean age 56 years) undergoing reoperative surgery for degenerated aortic bioprostheses between 1978 and 1997.
E
Exposure
Emergency reoperation for degenerated aortic bioprosthesis
C
Comparator
Elective reoperation for degenerated aortic bioprosthesis
O
Outcome
Operative mortality and predictors of emergency reoperationhard clinical

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 11.17 (95% CI 4.33–28.85)

Absolute Event Rate: 22.6% vs 1.4%

p-value: p=<0.0001

Elective replacement of failed aortic bioprostheses is safe with low mortality (1.4%), whereas emergency reoperation carries a significantly higher mortality risk (22.6%), emphasizing the need for early intervention at the first sign of dysfunction.

Cite This Study

Vogt et al. (2000) conducted a cohort in Degenerated aortic bioprostheses (n=172). Emergency reoperation vs. Elective replacement was evaluated on Operative mortality (OR 11.17, 95% CI 4.33-28.85, p=<0.0001). Emergency reoperation for degenerated aortic bioprostheses was associated with significantly higher operative mortality compared to elective replacement (22.6% vs 1.4%; P<0.0001).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a9bdfe40b073dbbe4b21216https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00363-2
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Risk of Reoperation in Patients with Bioprosthetic Valves1991 · 14 citations
  2. 2Aortic Valve Selection in the Elderly Patient1988 · 59 citations
  3. 3Thrombotic and Bleeding Complications of Prosthetic Heart Valves1987 · 292 citations
  4. 4Fifteen-Year Experience with 1678 Hancock Porcine Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Replacements1989 · 114 citations