Key result
Emergency reoperation for degenerated aortic bioprostheses was associated with significantly higher operative mortality compared to elective replacement (22.6% vs 1.4%; P<0.0001).
Why the study?
Does emergency reoperation compared to elective reoperation increase operative mortality in patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses?
Population
172 patients who had their first bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement between 1975 and 1988 and underwent…
Comparison
Emergency reoperation for degenerated aortic… vs Elective reoperation for degenerated aortic…
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Supports early detection of bioprosthetic failure to enable elective reoperation; leaves open prospective validation of timing strategies.
Cohort (n=172)
Does emergency reoperation compared to elective reoperation increase operative mortality in patients with degenerated aortic bioprostheses?
Odds Ratio: 11.17 (95% CI 4.33–28.85)
Absolute Event Rate: 22.6% vs 1.4%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Elective replacement of failed aortic bioprostheses is safe with low mortality (1.4%), whereas emergency reoperation carries a significantly higher mortality risk (22.6%), emphasizing the need for early intervention at the first sign of dysfunction.
Vogt et al. (2000) conducted a cohort in Degenerated aortic bioprostheses (n=172). Emergency reoperation vs. Elective replacement was evaluated on Operative mortality (OR 11.17, 95% CI 4.33-28.85, p=<0.0001). Emergency reoperation for degenerated aortic bioprostheses was associated with significantly higher operative mortality compared to elective replacement (22.6% vs 1.4%; P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: