Key result
The Chinese version of the Heart Failure Needs Assessment Questionnaire demonstrated strong reliability (Cronbach α 0.90) and validity (CFI=0.933, RMSEA=0.072) in patients with heart failure.
Why the study?
Heart failure management presents growing unaddressed needs, making comprehensive assessments essential to provide personalized care in Mainland China.
Observational (n=246)
Yes
Effect estimate: Cronbach α 0.90
The Chinese version of the Heart Failure Needs Assessment Questionnaire is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the unmet needs of heart failure patients in Mainland China.
Supports needs assessment in Chinese HF patients; extends validation to this population but leaves open need for prospective testing.
The management of heart failure in patients presents a significant challenge to global public health, marked by an increase in unaddressed needs due to the extended deterioration of health. It is crucial to conduct comprehensive assessments of patients with heart failure, thereby providing personalized care. The purpose of this study was to translate, adapt, and validate the Needs Assessment Questionnaire for people with heart failure in Mainland China and to evaluate its reliability and validity within a population of people with heart failure. A cohort of 246 individuals diagnosed with heart failure was recruited from two medical facilities in China during the period from January 2023 to June 2023. The scale was translated into Chinese using the forward post‐translation technique, followed by an evaluation of its reliability and validity. Descriptive statistics, content validity assessment, and Confirmatory Factor Analysis were utilized for validation. Internal consistency, split‐half reliability, and test‐retest reliability assessments were conducted to assess overall reliability. The Chinese version of the Heart Failure Needs Assessment Questionnaire consists of 4 dimensions and 30 items. The Cronbach α coefficient of the overall scale was 0.90. In the validation factor analysis, the model fit results were χ2/df = 2.259, CFI = 0.933, IFI = 0.933, TLI = 0.927, RMSEA = 0.072, all of which fell within acceptable ranges. The HFNAQ demonstrates strong reliability and validity in assessing the unmet needs of patients with heart failure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mei et al. (2025) conducted an observational in heart failure (n=246). Heart Failure Needs Assessment Questionnaire was evaluated on Reliability and validity (Cronbach α 0.90). The Chinese version of the Heart Failure Needs Assessment Questionnaire demonstrated strong reliability (Cronbach α 0.90) and validity (CFI=0.933, RMSEA=0.072) in patients with heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: