Key result
Elderly patients aged ≥80 years undergoing PCI had a higher 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to nonelderly patients.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention have different efficacy and safety outcomes in elderly patients compared to nonelderly patients?
Cohort (n=1,923)
Yes
Does percutaneous coronary intervention have different efficacy and safety outcomes in elderly patients compared to nonelderly patients?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elderly patients undergoing PCI have a higher 1-year MACE rate compared to younger patients, though outcomes for elective PCI are comparable and DES use is associated with lower cardiac death and TLR in the elderly.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the 1-year outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for elderly patients (aged ≥ 80 years) in the second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) era. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between August 2012 and July 2013, 1923 consecutive patients (mean age, 71 ± 11 years; ≥80 years, 23%; men, 77%) who underwent 2250 elective/urgent PCI procedures were enrolled in the Shinshu Prospective Multicenter Analysis for Elderly Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention registry. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) at 1 year. The 1-year incidence of MACEs, cardiac death, and stroke was significantly higher in elderly patients than in nonelderly patients (12.4% vs 5.3%, P < .0001; 7.8% vs 2.2%, P < .0001; and 2.8% vs 1.3%, P = .033, respectively). However, no significant difference in elective PCI procedures was detected. In elderly patients, the incidence of cardiac death and target lesion revascularization was significantly lower for DES than for non-DES (2.7% vs 10.5%, P = .0001 and 4.1% vs 8.6%, P = .029, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although elderly patients had a significantly poorer prognosis than younger patients, the adverse events rate was comparable in those patients who underwent elective PCI in the second-generation DES era.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miura et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Coronary Artery Disease (n=1,923). Elderly age (≥80 years) vs. Nonelderly age (<80 years) was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs; cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) at 1 year (p=< .0001). Elderly patients aged ≥80 years undergoing PCI had a higher 1-year incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to nonelderly patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: