Key result
Fluoroscopic determination of the optimal projection for LMCA ostial intervention using superimposed wires agreed with 3D-CT (mean difference -3.22° horizontally, 95% limits -7.26 to 0.81; P=0.11).
Why the study?
Current recommendations for optimal fluoroscopic views during left main coronary artery ostium intervention are empirical.
Does a fluoroscopic method of superimposing wires in the NCC and RCC accurately determine the optimal projection for LMCA ostial intervention compared to 3D-CT reconstruction?
Observational (n=50)
Does a fluoroscopic method of superimposing wires in the NCC and RCC accurately determine the optimal projection for LMCA ostial intervention compared to 3D-CT reconstruction?
Mean Difference: -3.22 (95% CI -7.26–0.81)
p-value: p=0.11
The optimal projection for LMCA ostial intervention can be accurately determined using fluoroscopic images of superimposing wires in the NCC and RCC when the LMCA ostium faces the NCC-RCC commissure.
May guide LMCA ostium views during intervention; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Background. Current recommendations for the best views for the left main coronary artery (LMCA) ostium intervention are empirical. Objectives. To determine the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium using only fluoroscopy. Methods. The optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium was determined using fluoroscopic images of superimposing the lowest points of the distal ends of two J tipped wires in the noncoronary cusp (NCC) and right coronary cusp (RCC). This was validated independently using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) reconstruction. Results. Satisfactory images of the overlapping wires in NCC and RCC could be obtained in 90% (45/50). Between the fluoroscopic and the 3D-CT reconstruction approaches, the mean difference for NCC and RCC overlapping at horizontal axes is -1.8 with a 95% limit of agreement between −3.94 and 0.34 p = 0.10 and at vertical axes −1.6 with a 95% limit of agreement between −3.46 and 0.26 p = 0.09 ; and the mean difference for the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium at horizontal axes is −3.22 with a 95% limit of agreement between -7.26 and 0.81 p = 0.11 and at vertical axes −2.31 with a 95% limit of agreement between −5.83 and 1.21 p = 0.09 . The 3D angulation deviation for the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium was 8.5° ± 4.7° when the LMCA ostium faced the NCC-RCC commissure (n = 32) and 22.3° ± 16.0° p = 0.009 when it did not (n = 13). Conclusions. The optimal projection for LMCA ostial intervention can be determined using fluoroscopic images of superimposing wires in the NCC and RCC when the LMCA ostium faces the NCC-RCC commissure, as was the case in 71% of the patients studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheng et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Left main coronary artery ostial intervention (n=50). Fluoroscopic determination using superimposing wires in NCC and RCC vs. 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) reconstruction was evaluated on Mean difference for the optimal projection to visualize the LMCA ostium at horizontal axes (MD -3.22, 95% CI -7.26 to 0.81, p=0.11). Fluoroscopic determination of the optimal projection for LMCA ostial intervention using superimposed wires agreed with 3D-CT (mean difference -3.22° horizontally, 95% limits -7.26 to 0.81; P=0.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: