This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: The perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with 1st or 2nd-generation cephalosporins is evidence-based in orthopedic surgery. There are, however, situations with a high risk of prophylaxis-resistant surgical site infections (SSI). Methods: We perform a superiority randomized-controlled trial with a 10% margin and a power of 90% in favor of the broad-spectrum prophylaxis. We will randomize orthopedic interventions with a high risk for SSI (open fractures, surgery under therapeutic antibiotics, tumor surgery, spine surgery with ASA-Score ≥ 3 points) in a prospective-alternating scheme (1:1, standard prophylaxis with mostly cefuroxime versus a broad-spectrum prophylaxis of a combined single-shot of vancomycin 1 g & gentamicin 5 mg/kg parenterally). The primary outcomes are "remission" at 6 weeks; or at 1 year for surgeries with implant. Secondary outcomes are the risk for prophylaxis-resistant SSI pathogens, revision surgery for any reason, change of antibiotic therapy, adverse events and the incidence of non-SSI infections within 6 weeks (e.g. urine infections). With event-free surgeries to 95% in the broad-spectrum versus 85% in the standard arm, we need 2 x 207 orthopedic surgeries among all groups. Discussion: In selected patients with a high risk for prophylaxis-resistant SSI, a broad-spectrum combination might prevent SSIs better than the standard prophylaxis. Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT05502380. Registered on 12 August 2022. Protocol version: 2 (3 June 2022)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uçkay et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: