Key result
There is no significant difference in postoperative bleeding complications between novel oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists following invasive dental procedures.
Why the study?
Dental treatment of patients with an increased bleeding risk due to anticoagulant and or antiplatelet drugs poses a challenge, making it important for dentists to understand bleeding complications.
Do NOACs compared to VKAs affect the risk of postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing invasive dental procedures?
Do NOACs compared to VKAs affect the risk of postoperative bleeding in patients undergoing invasive dental procedures?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NOACs do not significantly increase postoperative bleeding compared to VKAs in patients undergoing invasive dental procedures, supporting the use of local hemostatic measures without necessarily stopping anticoagulation.
The incidence of thromboembolic diseases is high. It is one of the leading causes of death and disability. Anticoagulants are used for preventing or reducing blood clot formation and treatment of other related thrombotic disorders. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) were developed more than 60 years ago. Warfarin is the most commonly used VKA. The drawbacks of vitamin K antagonists were that it requires frequent monitoring and dose adjustments, food and drug interactions, narrow therapeutic range, diet restrictions. For the past 15 years, various new drugs have been introduced to overcome the disadvantages of vitamin K antagonists. In 2008, a new group of anticoagulants were introduced. They are known as novel anticoagulants (NOAC) or direct oral anticoagulants. They include dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban and edoxaban. The major issue with NOAC is difficulty in monitoring the dose. A literature search was done on this topic. It is very important for the dentists to know the bleeding complications in patients under anticoagulant therapy. The dental treatment of patients who tend to have an increased risk of bleeding due to the use of anticoagulants and / or antiplatelet drugs raises a challenge in the daily practice of dental professionals. According to current evidence, there is no significant difference in postoperative bleeding between novel anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists. The risk of thromboembolic events on stopping the anticoagulants should be assessed. Local haemostatic measures are shown to suffice to control possible bleeding secondary to dental treatments. KEY WORDS Anticoagulants; Apixaban; Dabigatran; Dentistry; Edoxaban; Rivaroxaban.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pavithra et al. (2021) conducted a review in Patients on anticoagulants undergoing invasive dental procedures. Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) vs. Vitamin K Antagonists (VKAs) was evaluated on Postoperative bleeding complications. There is no significant difference in postoperative bleeding complications between novel oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists following invasive dental procedures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: