Key result
Dabigatran does not require regular coagulation monitoring, and its temporary discontinuation must be assessed according to the bleeding risk involved in the specific dental procedure.
Why the study?
How should novel oral anticoagulants be managed in patients undergoing dental treatments to balance bleeding and thrombotic risks?
How should novel oral anticoagulants be managed in patients undergoing dental treatments to balance bleeding and thrombotic risks?
This review highlights the need for individualized assessment of bleeding versus thrombotic risk when managing NOACs like dabigatran during dental procedures, without the need for routine coagulation monitoring.
DOACs appear safe for dental procedures with local hemostasis; leaves open need for randomized trials to guide periprocedural management.
Background: A new group of oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) with clear advantages over classic dicoumarin oral anticoagulants (warfarin and acenocoumarol) has been developed in recent years. Patients being treated with oral anticoagulants are at higher risk for bleeding when undergoing dental treatments. Material and Methods: A literature search was conducted through April 2016 for publications in the ISI Web of Knowledge, PubMed and Cochrane Library using the keywords "dabigatran", "rivaroxaban", "apixaban", "edoxaban", "new oral anticoagulants", "novel oral anticoagulants", "bleeding" and "dental treatment". Results: There is no need for regular coagulation monitoring of patients on dabigatran therapy. Whether or not to temporarily discontinue dabigatran must be assessed according to the bleeding risk involved in the dental procedure to be performed. Conclusions: The number of patients under treatment with new oral anticoagulants will increase in the coming years. It is essential to know about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of new oral anticoagulants and about their interactions with other drugs. It is necessary to develop clinical guidelines for the perioperative and postoperative management of these new oral anticoagulants in oral surgical procedures, and to carefully evaluate the bleeding risk of dental treatment, as well as the thrombotic risk of suppressing the new oral anticoagulant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Curto et al. (2017) conducted a review in Patients taking dabigatran requiring dental treatment. Dabigatran was evaluated. Dabigatran does not require regular coagulation monitoring, and its temporary discontinuation must be assessed according to the bleeding risk involved in the specific dental procedure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: