Why the study?
Do new oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin alter the risk of bleeding events and complications in patients requiring multiple dental extractions?
Do new oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin alter the risk of bleeding events and complications in patients requiring multiple dental extractions?
This paper aims to evaluate the bleeding risks of new oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in dental practice to guide safe management during multiple extractions.
Literature review leaves bleeding risk management with NOACs versus warfarin during multiple extractions unresolved; prospective trials needed before practice change.
The oral anticoagulant therapy is used for the cure and the prevention of thromboembolic diseases. In the last fifty years the warfarin has been considered the oral anticoagulant of choice. However, its use is limited by a narrow therapeutic index and by a complex pharmacodynamics, which requires regular adjustments and monitoring of the dose. Recently, three new oral anticoagulant - dabigatran etexilato (direct thrombin inhibitor), rivaroxaban and apixaban (Xa factor direct inhibitor) - have been approved for use in europe. Increasing the number of patients taking these drugs, it is important that the dentist knows these new oral anticoagulants, their indications and methods of action, in particular for the management of patients, who require invasive treatments. With regard to the management of the patient threated with the new oral anticoagulants (NAO), there have been new significant changes in the procedure compared to the one followed by patients treated with warfarin. This led to the development of new guidelines that the dentist has to follow in order to ensure a safe and appropriate dental treatment and reduce any postoperative complications. The aim of this work is to evaluate the effectiveness of the new oral anticoagulants compared to warfarin, especially in terms of risks of bleeding events and intra and postoperative complications, in patients requiring multiple dental extractions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miranda et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: