Key result
Canadian high school rugby coaches demonstrated high intention to use a rugby-specific neuromuscular training warm-up both before (92%) and after (86%) a train-the-coach workshop, with no significant difference between timepoints (p=0.10).
Why the study?
Canadian rugby coach injury prevention beliefs and attitudes had not been studied despite being key to informing injury prevention strategy implementation, and adoption of neuromuscular training warm-up programs remains variable.
Does a rugby-specific NMT warm-up workshop improve intention to use NMT warm-ups in Canadian high school rugby coaches?
Observational (n=48)
Yes
Does a rugby-specific NMT warm-up workshop improve intention to use NMT warm-ups in Canadian high school rugby coaches?
Absolute Event Rate: 86% vs 92%
p-value: p=0.10
Canadian high school rugby coaches have a high baseline intention to use rugby-specific neuromuscular training warm-ups, which was not significantly changed by a workshop.
High coach intention supports neuromuscular training adoption; leaves open workshop impact on actual implementation.
Background: Canadian rugby coach injury prevention beliefs and attitudes have not been studied, yet are key to informing injury prevention strategy implementation. Despite neuromuscular training (NMT) warm-up success in reducing injury, adoption of these programs is variable. Therefore, objectives of this study included (1) describing Canadian youth rugby coach injury prevention beliefs and attitudes and current warm-up practices and (2) evaluating intention to use a rugby-specific NMT warm-up. Methods: High school rugby coaches completed a questionnaire before and after a rugby-specific NMT warm-up workshop. The pre-workshop questionnaire captured demographics, current warm-up practice, and NMT warm-up knowledge and use. Both questionnaires captured injury prevention beliefs, attitudes and behavioral intention. Results: Forty-eight coaches participated in the workshops. Pre-workshop, 27% of coaches were aware of NMT warm-ups. Coaches primarily included aerobic and stretching components, while balance components were not common in their warm-ups over the past year. Additionally, 92% of coaches agreed to some extent they would “complete a rugby-specific warm-up program prior to every game and training session this season.” Post-workshop, 86% of coaches agreed to some extent that they would use the program in every rugby session. No differences were observed between pre- and post-workshop intention to implement the warm-up ( p = 0.10). Interpretation: This is the first study to examine current Canadian youth rugby coach warm-up practices and intention to use NMT warm-ups. Canadian rugby coach intention to use a rugby-specific NMT warm-up is high, providing ample opportunity to investigate the efficacy of a NMT warm-up in youth rugby.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shill et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Injury prevention beliefs and attitudes (n=48). Train-the-coach rugby-specific neuromuscular training (NMT) warm-up workshop vs. Pre-workshop baseline was evaluated on Intention to implement a rugby-specific NMT warm-up (p=0.10). Canadian high school rugby coaches demonstrated high intention to use a rugby-specific neuromuscular training warm-up both before (92%) and after (86%) a train-the-coach workshop, with no significant difference between timepoints (p=0.10).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: