Key result
In patients aged 60-70 years undergoing aortic valve replacement, the use of bioprosthetic valves increased significantly from 22.5% in 2006 to 76.8% in 2016 (P<0.001).
Why the study?
Current guidelines do not unequivocally recommend bioprosthetic or mechanical prostheses for middle-aged patients aged 60–70 years undergoing AVR, leaving prosthesis selection complex.
What are the trends and predictors of bioprosthetic versus mechanical valve selection in patients aged 60-70 years undergoing isolated AVR?
Population
9,616 patients aged 60–70 years undergoing isolated AVR in Poland
Comparison
Bioprosthetic vs mechanical heart valves
Design
National cardiac surgery registry-based study
Authors
Loading...
Marked shift toward bioprosthetic valves in 60-70 year olds; leaves open questions on durability, reintervention, and long-term outcomes.
Observational (n=9,616)
Yes
What are the trends and predictors of bioprosthetic versus mechanical valve selection in patients aged 60-70 years undergoing isolated AVR?
Absolute Event Rate: 76.8% vs 22.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
Real-world registry data from Poland demonstrates a dramatic shift toward bioprosthetic valves over mechanical valves for isolated AVR in borderline patients aged 60-70 years, rising from 22.5% in 2006 to 76.8% in 2016.
Bartuś et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Aortic valve replacement (n=9,616). Bioprosthetic heart valves vs. Mechanical heart valves was evaluated on Proportion of bioprosthetic valves implanted in 2016 vs 2006 (p=<0.001). In patients aged 60-70 years undergoing aortic valve replacement, the use of bioprosthetic valves increased significantly from 22.5% in 2006 to 76.8% in 2016 (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: