Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates shock reversal and survival to discharge with Impella RP in acute pulmonary embolism, indicating rapid hemodynamic benefit.
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) failure due to pulmonary embolism (PE) increases morbidity and mortality and contributes to prolonged hospital length of stay and higher costs of care. RV mechanical circulatory support (MCS) including Impella RP devices have been increasingly used in hemodynamically compromised PE patients who are refractory to intravascular volume expansion and inotropic therapy. However, effectiveness and safety of Impella RP, in hemodynamically unstable PE patients is unknown. METHODS: We included consecutive patients who presented to Detroit Medical Center between November 3, 2015 and October 2, 2017 with acute PE and had evidence of hemodynamic compromise indicating Impella RP. RESULTS: (range 1.88-3.4), after 24 h of treatment. Similarly, mean heart rate reduced to 92 beats per minute (79-105), and mean systolic blood pressure increased to 140 mmHg (115-179). No significant changes were found in renal function, hemoglobin and platelets level during device use. One patient experienced hemoglobin drop from 13.7 to 7.3 g/dL but did not require blood transfusion. All patients survived to discharge. CONCLUSION: In patients with PE and RV shock, Impella RP device resulted in immediate hemodynamic benefit with reversal of shock and favorable survival to discharge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elder et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: