Key result
Resistance exercise blunts systolic BP reactivity to mental stress by ~28% in older hypertensive women.
Why the study?
Does resistance exercise reduce blood pressure reactivity during mental stress in older hypertensive women?
Does resistance exercise reduce blood pressure reactivity during mental stress in older hypertensive women?
Absolute Event Rate: 12.5% vs 17.4%
p-value: p=0.01
Resistance exercise acutely attenuates blood pressure reactivity to mental stress in older hypertensive women, suggesting a potential mechanism for acute cardiovascular risk reduction.
Should not yet change practice; hypothesis-generating for resistance exercise in older hypertensive women and requires randomized confirmation.
Blood pressure reactivity to mental stress is attenuated following resistance exercise in older hypertensive women Rafael Gauche,1 Ricardo M Lima,1,2 Jonathan Myers,2 André B Gadelha,1 Silvia GR Neri,1 Claudia LM Forjaz,3 Lauro C Vianna1 1Faculty of Physical Education, University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil; 2Cardiology Division, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System and Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA; 3School of Physical Education and Sport, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effects of resistance exercise (RE) on autonomic control and blood pressure (BP) reactivity during mental stress (MS) in treated older hypertensive women. Methods: Ten older hypertensive women (age =71.1±5.5 years; body mass index =24.2±3.9; mean BP [MBP] =85.4±3.5) underwent a protocol consisting of BP and heart rate variability (HRV) output assessments at baseline and during MS, and these measurements were taken before and 60 minutes after two bouts of RE (traditional and circuit). MS was induced through a computerized 3-minute Stroop color–word test before and 1 hour after each exercise session; BP was measured every minute during MS, and HRV was monitored as a measure of cardiac autonomic control. Results: A significant effect of time on systolic BP (∆pre =17.4±12.8 versus ∆post =12.5±9.6; P=0.01), diastolic BP (∆pre =13.7±7.1 versus ∆post =8.8±4.5; P=0.01), and MBP (∆pre =14.0±7.7 versus ∆post =9.3±5.4; P<0.01) after RE was observed, with no differences between the two sessions. In addition, a significant effect of time on log-normalized low-frequency component of HRV (ms2; 5.3±0.8 pre-exercise MS versus 4.8±1.0 baseline value; P=0.023) was also observed, showing a significant change from baseline to MS before RE, but not after RE sessions. These results may be related to a lessened RE-mediated cardiac sympathetic activity during MS. Conclusion: RE is an effective tool to reduce BP reactivity to MS, which could therefore be associated with an acute reduction in cardiovascular risk. This result presents relevant clinical implications, combining previous evidence that recommends this exercise modality as an important component of an exercise program designed for the older and hypertensive subjects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gauche et al. (2017) studied Hypertension (n=10). Resistance exercise vs. Pre-exercise baseline was evaluated on Systolic blood pressure reactivity to mental stress (p=0.01). Resistance exercise significantly attenuated systolic blood pressure reactivity to mental stress compared to pre-exercise baseline (change of 12.5 vs 17.4; P=0.01) in older hypertensive women.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: