Key result
Self-management of oral anticoagulation increased 10-year survival compared to conventional measurement by a general practitioner (84.5% vs 76.1%) in patients with mechanical heart valves.
Why the study?
Does self-management of oral anticoagulation improve long-term survival in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement?
RCT (n=930)
Does self-management of oral anticoagulation improve long-term survival in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement?
Absolute Event Rate: 84.5% vs 76.1%
Self-management of oral anticoagulation significantly improves long-term survival in patients with mechanical heart valves compared to conventional management by a general practitioner.
Self-management was associated with higher survival; leaves open whether randomized trials would confirm benefit or change practice.
Aims: The Early Self-Controlled Anticoagulation Trial has demonstrated that in patients with mechanical heart valve replacement self-management of oral anticoagulation results in less major thromboembolic events than conventional measurement by the general practitioner. However, the effects of self-management on long-term survival are currently not known. Methods: Nine hundred thirty patients participated in a follow up study of the aforementioned trial (488 from the self-management group and 442 from the conventional group). Long-term survival was assessed 12 years after study begin using the intent-to treat analysis as well as the per protocol analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in order to assess independent predictors of survival. Results: In total, the 930 patients accrued 8,315 patient-years of observation. During follow up, 236 patients died. According to the intent-to treat analysis, 10-year survival was 76.1% in the conventional group and 84.5% in the self-management group. The corresponding values for the per protocol analysis were 67.7% and 80.6%, respectively. Age, kind of valve surgery, and study group were independent predictors of survival. Self-management of oral anticoagulation increased long-term survival by 23% (intent-to treat analysis) and 33% (per protocol analysis), respectively, compared to conventional measurement by the general practitioner. Possible reasons for these advantageous results in the self-management group are fewer thromboembolic events due to a higher percentage of INR values lying in the target range compared with conventional group. Conclusions: Data indicate that self-management of oral anticoagulation is a promising strategy in order to increase long-term survival in patients with mechanical prosthetic valves.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Körtke et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in Mechanical heart valve replacement (n=930). Self-management of oral anticoagulation vs. Conventional measurement by the general practitioner was evaluated on 10-year survival. Self-management of oral anticoagulation increased 10-year survival compared to conventional measurement by a general practitioner (84.5% vs 76.1%) in patients with mechanical heart valves.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: