Key result
Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (3.17% vs 2.57%; OR 1.24) and complications compared to non-CTO PCI.
Why the study?
PCI in patients with chronic total occlusion is commonly performed despite unclear long-term benefits.
Does percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion increase inpatient mortality and complications compared to PCI for non-CTO lesions in adult patients?
Observational (n=2,011,854)
Yes
Does percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion increase inpatient mortality and complications compared to PCI for non-CTO lesions in adult patients?
Odds Ratio: 1.24 (95% CI 1.18–1.31)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.17% vs 2.57%
p-value: p=<0.001
In a large US national database, PCI for chronic total occlusion was associated with significantly higher inpatient mortality and procedural complications compared to PCI for non-CTO lesions.
CTO PCI may carry higher periprocedural risk; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) is commonly performed despite unclear long-term benefits. The goal of this study was to evaluate the post-procedural outcome of patients with CTO intervention. Methods The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, years 2016-2020, was studied using ICD 10 codes. Patients with CTO intervention were compared to patients without CTO. We evaluated post-procedural mortality and complications. Results PCI in patients with CTO was associated with higher mortality and all post-procedural complications. A total of 2,011,854 patients underwent PCI with 259,574 having CTO. The CTO group had a 3.17% mortality rate vs 2.57% of non-CTO PCI. (OR, 1.24; CI:1.18–1.31; p<0.001). Using multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, race, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease, CTO PCI remained significantly associated with higher mortality (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.3 – 1.45; p<0.001). Patients with CTO compared to non-CTO PCI patients had higher rates of myocardial infarction (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 2.54 – 3.21; p<0.001), coronary perforation (OR, 6.01; 95% CI, 5.25-6.89; p<0.001), tamponade (OR, 3.36; 95% CI, 2.91-3.88, p<0.001), contrast-induced nephropathy (OR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.45-2.90), p<0.001), procedural bleeding (OR, 3.57; 95% CI, 3.27-3.89, p<0.001), and acute post-procedural respiratory failure (OR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.81-2.36, p<0.001). All post-procedural complications were more than 3 times the non-CTO patients (OR, 3.45; 95% CI, 3.24-3.67; p<0.001). Conclusion Using a large national inpatient database, PCI performed in patients with CTO was associated with significantly much higher mortality and post-procedural complications compared to PCI in non-CTO patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathan et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Coronary Artery Disease undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (n=2,011,854). PCI for Chronic Total Occlusion (CTO) vs. PCI for non-CTO lesions was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.18-1.31, p=<0.001). Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion was associated with significantly higher in-hospital mortality (3.17% vs 2.57%; OR 1.24) and complications compared to non-CTO PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: