Why the study?
Does successful CTO PCI improve all-cause mortality compared to unsuccessful CTO PCI or non-CTO PCI in patients undergoing PCI?
Does successful CTO PCI improve all-cause mortality compared to unsuccessful CTO PCI or non-CTO PCI in patients undergoing PCI?
Successful PCI for chronic total occlusion is associated with long-term mortality rates comparable to non-CTO PCI, whereas failed CTO PCI is associated with significantly worse survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Successful CTO PCI was associated with mortality similar to non-CTO PCI; leaves open whether revascularization improves outcomes versus medical therapy.
Background Fifteen percent of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing angiography have a chronic total occlusion (CTO). The current study aimed to investigate the long‐term prognosis after successful and unsuccessful CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with PCI for non‐CTO lesions. Methods and Results The current study was designed as an observational, region‐wide, register‐based cohort study enrolling all patients undergoing PCI in the Central Region of Denmark in 2009 to 2019. Patients were stratified into non‐CTO, successful CTO, and unsuccessful CTO revascularization. Patients were followed until an event or January 1, 2022. The primary end point was all‐cause mortality. In 21 141 patients enrolled, 2108 underwent CTO PCI. Clinical presentation was acute coronary syndrome in 11 879 patients and chronic coronary syndrome in 7887 patients. After a median of 5.7 years (interquartile range, 3.3–8.8), long‐term all‐cause mortality was higher after CTO PCI compared with non‐CTO PCI, but the difference was statistically insignificant when adjusting for clinical factors (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.19 [95% CI, 1.09–1.29], adjusted HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.97–1.20]; P =0.165). After successful CTO PCI, no difference compared with non‐CTO PCI was observed (unadjusted HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.90–1.10], adjusted HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.87–1.12]; P =0.873). After unsuccessful CTO PCI, long‐term all‐cause mortality was higher than non‐CTO PCI (unadjusted HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.59–2.08], adjusted HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.13–1.63]; P <0.001). Conclusions Patients undergoing PCI for CTO have elevated long‐term mortality compared with patients without CTO. Successful opening of the CTO(s) is associated with equal mortality compared with non‐CTO PCI. In contrast, failed CTO PCI is associated with worse long‐term mortality. These findings suggest the need for CTO programs with high success rates and low complication rates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holck et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: