Key result
Failed CTO PCI linked to ~168% higher MACE risk compared with successful recanalization.
Why the study?
PCI for CTO remains challenging and its long-term clinical benefits are controversial.
Does successful CTO-PCI improve long-term MACE compared to failed CTO-PCI in patients with symptomatic or ischemic CTO?
Observational (n=448)
No
Does successful CTO-PCI improve long-term MACE compared to failed CTO-PCI in patients with symptomatic or ischemic CTO?
Hazard Ratio: 2.68 (95% CI 1.42–5.06)
Absolute Event Rate: 25.53% vs 14.71%
p-value: p=0.002
Successful CTO-PCI is associated with a significantly lower incidence of long-term MACE, improved survival, and better LVEF and NYHA class compared to failed CTO-PCI.
Failed CTO-PCI signals higher MACE risk; leaves open whether success improves outcomes and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remain challenging procedures with controversial long-term clinical benefits. METHODS: We conducted an observational monocentric study including consecutive patients who underwent PCI for CTO by experienced operators in a French University Hospital between January 2015 and December 2022. All patients had symptoms and/or proven myocardial ischemia. Patients were divided into two groups based on PCI success or failure. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of MACE, defined as the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization up to 8 years of follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 448 patients who underwent a CTO-PCI, 401 (89.5%) had a successful procedure, while 47 (10.5%) experienced a failed intervention. During a mean follow-up of 3.7 years, MACE occurred in 71 patients (15.8%), including 12 patients (25.5%) in the failed group and 59 patients (14.7%) in the successful group (HR 2.68 [1.42; 5.06]; p < 0.01). While both groups had similar baseline clinical risk profiles, the failed CTO-PCI group had a lower overall survival rate (74.5% vs. 88.8%; HR 2.23 [1.17; 4.27]; p = 0.02). The successful CTO-PCI group showed significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p < 0.01) and NYHA class (p < 0.01). The J-CTO score was the only predictor of procedural failure (1.96 [1.44; 2.67]; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Failed CTO-PCI was associated with increased incidence of MACE. LVEF and NYHA class was improved in successful CTO-PCI, supporting the pursuit of this procedure in selected cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnold et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Chronic total occlusions (CTO) (n=448). Failed CTO-PCI vs. Successful CTO-PCI was evaluated on Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.42; 5.06, p=0.002). Failed percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion was associated with a significantly higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared to successful intervention (HR 2.68).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: