Key result
Transvenous CRT device implantation was associated with significantly higher postoperative cardiac troponin I release compared to pacemaker or ICD implantation (AUC 1.79 vs 0.78 hr.ng/mL; P<0.05).
Why the study?
Does transvenous CRT device implantation increase cardiac troponin I release compared to standard pacemaker or ICD implantation?
Observational (n=30)
Does transvenous CRT device implantation increase cardiac troponin I release compared to standard pacemaker or ICD implantation?
CRT implantation causes a greater release of cardiac troponin I compared to standard pacemaker or ICD implantation, likely due to coronary sinus manipulation.
CRT implantation was associated with greater troponin release; hypothesis-generating for procedural risk and leaves clinical impact on outcomes open.
BACKGROUND: Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation increases cardiac troponin I (cTnI) levels which indicates myocardial injury. During implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device, balloon inflation for coronary sinus (CS) venogram, cannulation of CS side branch, and electrode advancement may interfere with CS drainage and, hence, may decrease the washout of toxic metabolites from the heart. Thus, CRT implantation may further increase cTnI levels. In this study, we investigated the effects of CRT implantation on cTnI release. METHODS: We included 10 patients (mean age = 57 +/- 15 years) in whom a successful transvenous CRT system was implanted (CRT group). Twenty patients (mean age = 65 +/- 10 years) who underwent a transvenous pacemaker or ICD implantation were included as the control group. Blood samples for cTnI were drawn at baseline and at six, 12, 18, and 24 hours thereafter. RESULTS: Baseline median cTnI levels were similar in CRT and control groups (0.03 ng/mL vs 0.02 ng/mL, respectively; P = 0.1). Postoperative cTnI levels during 24 hours were significantly higher in the CRT group (P < 0.05) by two-way repeated measures of analysis of variance. Post hoc analysis revealed that cTnI levels were higher at the 6th, 12th, 18th, and 24th hours compared to baseline levels (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively). There was a significant difference in the area under the curves (AUCs) of cTnI measurements (1.79 hr.ng/mL in the CRT group and 0.78 hr.ng/mL in the control group, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Postoperative cTnI levels were higher after CRT implantation than simple pacemaker/ICD implantation. This may be due to CS manipulation during CRT implantation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altın et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Patients undergoing cardiac device implantation (n=30). Transvenous cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation vs. Transvenous pacemaker or ICD implantation was evaluated on Area under the curve (AUC) of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) measurements over 24 hours (p=<0.05). Transvenous CRT device implantation was associated with significantly higher postoperative cardiac troponin I release compared to pacemaker or ICD implantation (AUC 1.79 vs 0.78 hr.ng/mL; P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: