Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve ventricular repolarization and reduce ventricular arrhythmias over time in patients with congestive heart failure?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve ventricular repolarization and reduce ventricular arrhythmias over time in patients with congestive heart failure?
CRT leads to a time-dependent reduction in transmural dispersion of repolarization and ventricular arrhythmias, particularly in patients who exhibit reverse remodeling.
May support Tp-e monitoring for CRT response and arrhythmia risk; hypothesis-generating without randomized confirmation.
AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves the clinical status of patients with congestive heart failure, although left ventricular epicardial pacing may increase transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR). The aim of this study was to investigate the time-dependent effect of CRT on ventricular repolarization and ventricular arrhythmia at mid-term follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group consisted of 84 patients treated with CRT. Twelve-lead electrocardiogram was digitally recorded and Tpeak-to-Tend interval (Tp-e) was measured at baseline, 1 week, 1 month, and 3, 6, and 12 months after device implantation. We determined the time-dependent changes in Tp-e, ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) during 12 months of follow-up, in both CRT responders and non-responders. Seventeen of 84 patients (20%) had VT/VF during first year. Six of those 17 patients (35%) experienced VT/VF within 1 month of implantation and diminished over time. Tp-e decreased significantly at 6 and 12 months after implantation compared with 1 week [108 ± 14 ms at 1 week vs. 97 ± 21 ms at 6 months (P = 0.03) and 95 ± 19 ms at 12 months (P = 0.01)]. Responders demonstrated a greater time-dependent reduction of Tp-e at 6 and 12 months of CRT and had a lower rate of VT/VF compared with non-responders (log-rank test, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Transmural dispersion of repolarization and the number of patients with VT/VF decreased over time after CRT. Patients with reverse remodelling demonstrated a lower rate of VT/VF and a greater time-dependent reduction of TDR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Itoh et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: