Key result
Biventricular pacing significantly reduced the Tpeak-Tend interval from 142.06 ms at baseline to 117.93 ms at 1-year follow-up (P<0.001), reflecting reverse electrical remodeling in heart failure.
Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve transmural dispersion of repolarization on long-term follow-up in patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=35)
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy improve transmural dispersion of repolarization on long-term follow-up in patients with heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 117.93% vs 142.06%
p-value: p=<0.001
Cardiac resynchronization therapy induces reverse electrical remodeling over 1 year, evidenced by a significant reduction in transmural dispersion of repolarization, which correlates with structural reverse remodeling and a lower risk of ventricular arrhythmias.
Supports electrical remodeling as a CRT mechanism in HF; leaves open whether Tpeak-Tend reduction predicts outcomes in randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on arrhythmogenicity and sudden death have not been fully ascertained. CRT has been shown to increase transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) immediately on implantation, which may favorably remodel on long-term follow-up. However, such a hypothesis has not been prospectively evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included 35 consecutive patients who underwent CRT implantation between September 2013 and August 2014 (mean age 56.8 ± 11.09 years; 71.43% males). QT and Tpeak-Tend (Tp-e) intervals were measured during endocardial (RVendoP), epicardial (LVepiP), and biventricular pacing (BiVP) at CRT implantation and 1-year follow-up. Compared to RVendoP (130.41 ± 16.75 ms), Tp-e was significantly prolonged during BiVP (142.06 ± 21.98 ms; P < 0.001) and LVepiP (183.45 ± 27.87 ms; P < 0.001) at baseline. There was a significant decrease in Tp-e during BiVP on follow-up (117.93 ± 15.03 ms; P < 0.001). High responders had significantly lower Tp-e at 1 year compared to low responders (113.16 ± 14.3 ms vs 129.59 ± 9.75 ms, P = 0.004). Tp-e at 1 year had strong negative correlation with reduction in LV end-systolic volumes (r = - 0.51; P = 0.003). Seven patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias during follow-up had significantly longer baseline Tp-e compared to those without arrhythmias (158.19 ± 17.59 ms vs 139.72 ± 20.94 ms, P = 0.043). A baseline Tp-e value of ≥ 148 ms had a specificity of 75% and sensitivity of 71% to predict ventricular arrhythmias. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline TDR is greater during BiVP and LV epiP compared with RVendoP in patients with heart failure. However, BiVP causes a significant reduction in TDR reflective of reverse electrical remodeling on long-term follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Banavalikar et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in heart failure (n=35). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (biventricular pacing) vs. Baseline was evaluated on Tpeak-Tend (Tp-e) interval (p=<0.001). Biventricular pacing significantly reduced the Tpeak-Tend interval from 142.06 ms at baseline to 117.93 ms at 1-year follow-up (P<0.001), reflecting reverse electrical remodeling in heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: